Author: craigmcc
Date: Thu Oct 28 00:39:28 2004
New Revision: 55794
Modified:
struts/trunk/build.xml
Log:
Add a dist call to struts-examples/mailreader even though it is not
included in the binary distribution, so that other targets can ultimately
depend on it. Sub-build calls in
Author: husted
Date: Thu Oct 28 03:44:07 2004
New Revision: 55804
Modified:
struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/src/java/org/apache/shale/impl/ImplApplicationFilter.java
Log:
Correct call to setAttribute method.
Modified:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
its to build on the JSF request processing lifecycle, without
committing you to any particular view tier templating approach.
Doing more work than that is ... more
How could there be a reason not to do this? (This is not a rhetorical
question.)
Jack
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
its
Author: craigmcc
Date: Thu Oct 28 09:52:04 2004
New Revision: 55877
Modified:
struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/build.xml
Log:
Tweak what the Ant build script calls this thing to match the
tweaked README.html language.
Modified: struts/trunk/contrib/struts-shale/build.xml
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
its to build on the JSF request processing lifecycle, without
committing you to any
Oops ... meant to reply to both Jack and the list.
Craig
-- Forwarded message --
From: Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:19:48 -0700
Subject: Re: Struts Shale
To: Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 06:51:32 -0700, Dakota Jack [EMAIL
Why is it not possible for the framework to use interfaces into which
JSF can be plugged in, perhaps with adapters, as an option well as
other alternatives? This too is not a rhetorical question.
Jack
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 10:16:56 -0700, Craig McClanahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28
I think that's Ted's basic point.
My answer is to consider how much extra machinery you have to build in
to the Struts abstraction of what a ViewController is so that an
application built on top of Struts can use different technologies.
Just as one example out of my list from the previous email
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31684.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
... that we rename the package called impl as faces.
As to the impl package:
I think what really bothers me here is that the classes implemented here are not part
of the Shale API. As soon as I saw ImplViewHandler, I starting looking around
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 07:08:40 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
On Tue, 26 Oct 2004 12:50:05 -0700, Craig McClanahan wrote:
My personal itch is to not have to build everything from scratch --
its to build on the JSF request processing lifecycle, without
committing you to any particular view
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 14:30:33 -0400, Ted Husted [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
... that we rename the package called impl as faces.
As to the impl package:
I think what really bothers me here is that the classes implemented here are not
Ted Husted wrote:
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 13:57:15 -0400, Ted Husted wrote:
... that we rename the package called impl as faces.
As to the impl package:
I think what really bothers me here is that the classes implemented here are not part
of the Shale API. As soon as I saw ImplViewHandler, I
I admit to a huge amount of ignorance about JSF. I have partly been
stymied by an inability to decide on a text to read. I have always
liked Hans work, and may go that direction. I cannot know, of course,
how that ignorance impacts my part in this discussion. I do think
that in any event it is
On Wed, 27 Oct 2004 16:34:51 -0400, Ted Husted
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead of taking the approach of predicting what
developers might want from Struts and JSF in the
future
You probably have little to worry about in this
regard, Scott. :)
Really? I am glad to hear that Shale will be
I have to agree with Craig here. Although I haven't used JSF that much
yet, I have investigated it enough to understand its basic infrastructure
and functionality. As Craig said, it would require much work to abstract
the same functionality in to Struts, where it is already available in JSF
(such
I have to agree with Craig here. Although I haven't used JSF that much
yet, I have investigated it enough to understand its basic infrastructure
and functionality. As Craig said, it would require much work to abstract
the same functionality in to Struts, where it is already available in JSF
(such
3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be widely deployed by then. If not, then our endorsement of it could
encourage people to
3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be widely deployed by then. If not, then our endorsement of it could
encourage people to
On Thu, 28 Oct 2004 15:27:49 -0700, Dakota Jack [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I admit to a huge amount of ignorance about JSF. I have partly been
stymied by an inability to decide on a text to read. I have always
liked Hans work, and may go that direction. I cannot know, of course,
how that
On Fri, 29 Oct 2004 01:22:09 +0200, Anders Steinlein
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
3.1 Java2 Standard Edition APIs
I'd be +1 for J2SE 5.0
Although I have no real saying in this, I am +1 on J2SE 5.0 as well. As I
would anticipate 1-2 years in development on Struts 2.x, J2SE 5.0 should
be
At 3:27 PM -0700 10/28/04, Dakota Jack wrote:
I admit to a huge amount of ignorance about JSF. I have partly been
stymied by an inability to decide on a text to read. I have always
liked Hans work, and may go that direction. I cannot know, of course,
how that ignorance impacts my part in this
Craig is starting from his knowledge of JSF and proscribing it as a
facility for providing a lot of functionality to Shale.
er... prescribing. Sorry.
Joe
--
Joe Germuska
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://blog.germuska.com
In fact, when I die, if I don't hear 'A Love Supreme,' I'll turn
DO NOT REPLY TO THIS EMAIL, BUT PLEASE POST YOUR BUG
RELATED COMMENTS THROUGH THE WEB INTERFACE AVAILABLE AT
http://issues.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31922.
ANY REPLY MADE TO THIS MESSAGE WILL NOT BE COLLECTED AND
INSERTED IN THE BUG DATABASE.
Author: craigmcc
Date: Thu Oct 28 00:29:18 2004
New Revision: 55793
Added:
struts/trunk/struts-examples/mailreader/
- copied from rev 55792, struts/trunk/struts-examples/mailreader-database/
Removed:
struts/trunk/struts-examples/mailreader-database/
Log:
Move
26 matches
Mail list logo
