. That option is on the right-hand side of the
Reed-Solomon (RSID) tab mentioned in the previous paragraph.
Dave
K3DCW
On Aug 30, 2010, at 5:18 PM, Lynn wrote:
Could someone tell me if DM-780 uses RSID/TSID. Thought it supported it, but
can't find where to turn it on or off.
Thanks
Lynn
upgrade them to rarely QRM
existing QSOs (emergency conditions excepted), regulation by bandwidth
will become possible.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
it.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
- Original Message -
When that 1 percent deploys unattended stations that transmit without
first checking to see if the frequency is in use, they can create havoc far
out of proportion to their fraction of ham community.
Regulation by bandwidth
Listening for you in PA Russell
73
KB3MOW
Dave
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Russell Blair
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 4:44 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] CMSK63
Copy you 599 Russell, but guess you aren't hearing me
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Russell Blair
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 4:44 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re
suppose, but at 8000 Hz my card is off by
only .062% out and .017 in - that would make it somewhere around 8001 - hardly
enough to adjust for.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Russell Blair
Sent
Listening for you Claudio
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Claudio
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 7:17 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: CMSK63
Sorry, but not seeing any trace of you on the waterfall
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of my_call_is_ac4m
Sent: Wednesday, August 25, 2010 9:05 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject
long and definitely worth reviewing from time to time.
Dave
K3DCW
On Aug 24, 2010, at 9:16 AM, n4zq wrote:
Here is a response I got from Dan Henderson, N1ND, ARRL Regulatory
Information Manager about the legality of ROS here in the states. My question
was very simple. Is ROS a legal mode
I alternated calls to you and calls to CQ and never heard another
signal. Not sure how propagation is, though.
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Juergen
Sent: Tuesday, August 24, 2010 6:30 PM
Darned if I know of a set frequency for it, Andy, but given its'
bandwidth, I'd guess we'd be safe just about anywhere in the digital
bandplan as long as we don't park on top of another QSO!
How about 7.078?
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio
and Asia, and so
you have military, governmental and other users that are authorized to use the
band.
Dave
K3DCW
On Aug 21, 2010, at 11:35 AM, kc2axu wrote:
Hi ,,, got a question for you guy's... On 3.860.00usb to 3.863.00usb there is
a digital signal. Does anyone know what type or mode
Will there be a session on retrofitting WINMOR's excellent busy frequency
detector into Winlink PMBOs?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rick Muething
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 10
I suggested this to Rick a few months ago; he thought it worthy of
consideration.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: Victor Poor [mailto:vp...@att.net]
Sent: Thursday, August 19, 2010 5:02 PM
To: 'Dave AA6YQ'; digitalradio@yahoogroups.com; win...@yahoogroups.com
Are you looking for Quick Mix?
http://www.ptpart.co.uk/quickmix/
73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Hal
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2010 9:10 PM
To: DigitalRadio
Subject: [digitalradio
programs I run. So I thought I would start here. A Ham will know what I
need and why I need it to function in a certain way. I hope you can help.
Any help or suggested programs would be appreciated. Thanks, 73
Try QuickMix:
http://www.ptpart.co.uk/quickmix/
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
terminal in VB6.
Waggling the TXD line using the MSComm1.Break = True/False function will
do the job if timing can be assured.
Travelling to Alpha Centauri will be easy if the Warp Drive can be
assured.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
MMTTY to use EXTFSK for FSK output, an EXTFSK window
appears that lets you select the serial port, as well as the serial port pin
(TxD, RTS, DTR) that will be used to generate the FSK signal.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
provide a very nice twin-peak filter that is only available in
RTTY mode.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
and Multipsk.
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
programs
on Ubuntu...especially CQRlog and Fldigi; so why would you need windows
software for most applications.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 6:03 PM, Peter Frenning pe...@frenning.dk wrote:
ons, 28 07 2010 kl. 16:50 -0500, skrev n0alo:
Has anyone in the group tried the various windows
out there, and it is designed for
Linux (also works on OS X and Windows). There are also SSTV, DX Cluster,
Logging, CW, and many other ham-related packages available.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:06 PM, n0alo n0...@cox.net wrote:
About other programs, well I also like mmtty, mmsstv
of options. I have to agree with Phil's
comments that one shouldn't look to run Windows software under Linux, but
rather look for the best Linux tools out there to do the job.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:23 PM, Ted Bear w7...@juno.com wrote:
I wonder...? I never played with Linux
Great idea. Just remember, the Windows way of doing things doesn't always
translate into Ubuntu. Give Ubuntu a good period of time, learn to use it,
and you will not regret it.
Dave
On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 7:53 PM, n0alo n0...@cox.net wrote:
Thank you everyone for the very usefull
Thanks, Laurie.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Laurie, VK3AMA
Sent: Sunday, July 25, 2010 3:08 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [digitalradio] ROS v 4.8
Has anyone checked to see whether the ROS code contains a keylogger, trojans,
or a rootkit?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Saturday, July 24, 2010 7:37 PM
JTMS is 1500 BPS? Could it exceed the 300 baud limit on a single carrier,
like PSK500 does? That wouldn't strictly be a B/W issue, but it would be a
rule violation on HF.
--
Dave Sparks -- AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: n9dsj n9...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent
BINGO!!! I invoke Godwin's Law!!!
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin%27s_law
Dave
NK7Z
On Mon, 19 Jul 2010 18:56:58 -0700 (PDT)
AA0OI aa...@yahoo.com thus spake:
Spoken like a good Nazi
Garrett / AA0OI
From: Thomas F. Giella NZ4O n
as an unattended station running a wide mode without an
effective busy frequency detector; neither belongs on the amateur bands.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of John Becker, WOJAB
Sent
Actually, it's less than half of a 6 Khz. wide AM signal.
--
Dave - AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: bg...@comcast.net
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 7:12 PM
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Operating ROS In USA
so, for the sake
is completely irrelevant.
The nasty name-calling that appears below and in previous posts today is
flat-out unacceptable. Were I moderator of this group, the offending parties
would be long gone.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
renewal, and found that it had been issued on 7/13; a hardcopy arrived by
postal mail yesterday afternoon.
I don't see how this process could be any simpler...
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf
be considered a major threat to computer security in most
circles.
Am I the only one that wonders this?
Wow!
Dave
K3DCW
On Jul 15, 2010, at 4:18 PM, Robert Bennett wrote:
Everyone better use V1.0 then, or we shall end up using different versions
that don't talk to each other
. Other modes like MT63, Olivia o[r] Contestia use similar
techniques.
I do not know who wrote it.
What is the problem with it?
73 Rein W6SZ
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
the definition and petition for a modification, possibly with a bandwidth
restriction, possibly without. But, without changing the rule, the rest of the
discussion is moot.
Dave
K3DCW
On Jul 13, 2010, at 2:23 PM, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Hi Alan,
Why did you wait so long
definition does not increase the likelihood of causing harmful interference
or permit encrypted communications (concerns implicit in 97.311), the FCC
would likely welcome a change that improves our ability to abide by the
regulations without consuming their scarce resources.
73,
Dave
; this isn't one of them.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of W2XJ
Sent: Tuesday, July 13, 2010 4:35 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: [digital radio] Re: Random
towards ROS, everyone in the US would be
better off just staying away from it except about 220MHz.
Dave
K3DCW
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:19 PM, Siegfried Jackstien
siegfried.jackst...@freenet.de wrote:
That would mean if you would implement ros or similar in a multimode soft
like multipsk
of the other LEGAL modes out there,
of which there are dozens!
Dave
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 3:39 PM, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Hi Dave,
Why don't we try to meet this thing head on, instead of saying
too difficult, too boring, fed up and tired of talking, thinking
about it.
Please
is the last version.
73, Jose Alberto
*(Comments in this blog have been disabled)*
--
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
Real radio bounces off of the sky
Yes, he is spotting on 14112but a lot of those spots were on 14115 and
14103 which he is not monitoring.
Dave
K3DCW
On Jul 10, 2010, at 10:40 AM, rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
Steinar,
I believe you are reporting ( spotting ) stations at 14.112
because you are using ROS with your
anyone
viewing the Cluster think that these ROS spots are Human generated and
not auto-spot spam.
The ROS developer has NOT documented, in ether the User Guide or FAQ,
this auto-spot advertising facility of his software.
My observations.
de Laurie, VK3AMA
--
Dave
K3DCW
allow
this, and says take it or leave it, one must truly question what else it
does or can do.
Dave
K3DCW
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 7:05 PM, Laurie, VK3AMA group...@vkdxer.com wrote:
from his website
http://rosmodem.wordpress.com/2010/07/10/ros-and-cluster/
Jose says...
ROS uses a system
by any understanding of the social aspects of amateur radio.
Hopefully, some wise Elmer will take Jose in hand and help him grow up to more
constructively apply his obvious technical talent.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
,
GW7AAV,WA1ZMS,K3DCWyep, N1SZ got the good double whammy probation.
*Since that time, Jose has taken steps to further hide the list in the code
by changing his programming environment, making it much harder to decompile
the list. I'm not sure anyone has tried recently.
Dave
On Fri, Jul 9
perceived infraction,
but its entirely irrelevant because ROS is not legal for use by US
operators; it's like being put on the no use of aviation frequencies list.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
Dave,
Let me ask your a question after assuring that the use of ROS world
wide is increasing rapidly.
We can ignore that, as most do, we can be mad about it, we can as US
licensed radio amateurs say it does not concern us,it is not fair, etc etc.
If there is such a list, I plan to make a real big
to transmit,
it doesn't mean a thing.
Dave
K3DCW
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:06 PM, pd4u_dares p...@hotmail.com wrote:
I tried the new ROS version 4.6.0. and K5OKC,N1SZ and G4ILO worked. So the
hard coded banned call list no longer exists.
Marc, PD4U
--- In digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
even Jose would understand it to be insane to have programs distributed
with built-in banned lists.
Well, maybe he removed it, but it was definitely there at one timeso
maybe it was temporary insanity?
Dave
K3DCW
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 10:46 PM, Rein A rein...@ix.netcom.com wrote
join the rather distinguished group of those that have banned. I
was offended that I hadn't been included since I had been a rather vocal
opponent of the mode.
I never said that Jose didn't take suggestions; however I did say that he needs
to learn how to take suggestions AND criticism.
Dave
on the persona-non-grata list), and graciously accepts both
suggestions and criticism, many people will continue to campaign strongly
against the mode.
There, I went the whole response without mentioning the (il)legality of the
mode in the USA.
--
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
Real radio bounces off
K3UK
--
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
Real radio bounces off of the sky
)
hundreds of messages discussing the legality of the mode in the US.
Dave
K3DCW
On Jul 5, 2010, at 1:58 PM, phil g wrote:
I'm bored, so I'll bite.
It is my understanding that in the US, ROS is only allowed above 222Mhz.
On 40M, you would be held to SWL status.
You should find it around
months ago that he would
investigate
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 9:25 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Sunday, June 27, 2010 2:07 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Busy detect screenshot for Winmor
Dave,
I realize you
subbands is
entirely appropriate. But when experience leads such operators to become
confident, they should be free to venture out onto other frequencies to
which they are by regulation entitled to use.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
that WILL show up
during an emergency, effectively removing one or more channels on a regional
or even nationwide basic.
Dave
K3DCW
www.k3dcw.net
Real radio bounces off of the sky
On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 9:00 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
I see the brief mention in the latest QST
, MultiPSK or WinWarbler while logging QSOs to DXKeeper, using either
Commander or HRD for transceiver control.
See http://www.dxlabsuite.com/download.htm#Bridges, Gateways, and
Extenders
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
protocols, like 5.1 and so on.
Hope it's something simple like that!
Good luck es 73
Dave
KB3MOW
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Jeremy Cowgar
Sent: Saturday, June 05, 2010 3:25 PM
To: digitalradio
Exactly, Skip. Well put.
Dave
Real radio bounces off the sky
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of KH6TY
Sent: Wednesday, 02 June, 2010 17:38
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re: ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
needed corrections.
I'd be surprised if your version were still compatible with the current
version. Did you try making up a call and trying to put that in the
program, just to make sure that it is your specific call that terminates the
program and not any other random call?
--
Dave
AF6AS
for source code might be unnecessary, but IIRC a
complete specification of the protocol is necessary. That's why PACTOR is
legal. There has to be enough information to at least reverse-engineer a mode
by the FCC (and the NSA).
--
Dave - AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: John Becker
in allowing this software to reside on their
computer.
All of this is a shame as it is an interesting, albeit very wide,
weak-signal mode.
Dave
Real radio bounces off the sky
_
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rein A
Sent
Spread Spectrum.
--
Dave - AF6AS
--
From: rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:01 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] ROS MODEM OFFICIAL GROUP
Hello Dave, AF6AS,
IIRC what does it stand for?
There has
Found the section. It is 97.309(a)(4) of the code:
http://www.arrl.org/technical-characteristics
The reverse-engineering part is an inference on my part.
--
Dave Sparks
AF6AS
--
From: rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1:01 PM
I have been experimenting with APRS-PSK63 lately. I'll probably get back to
JT65 one of these days. I may even run ROS in beacon receive-only mode on
occasion.
--
Dave Sparks
AF6AS
--
From: rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 02, 2010 1
Configuration file to you
computer. Then, open TQSL Cert and import that new certificate. It adds
support for a LOT of data modes.
Dave
K3DCW
On May 31, 2010, at 9:56 AM, Paul wrote:
Hi Jeremy:
I asked LOTW help the exact question the other day and this is their response:
Open TQSL
Select
http://www.dxlabsuite.com/winwarbler/Heard.jpg
Entries can be sorted by clicking a column header (like a spreadsheet).
- Add a column to indicate mode.
- Provide filtering by mode (e.g. only show Olivia and Contestia entries)
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: sdrl
detector into
WinLink PMBOs, and lots of fun adding SDR Console support to DXLab.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
.
III support...
I can clearly see that this anti Pactor rant will Never end.
It's an anti-Winlink without busy frequency detection rant, John.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
On May 10, 2010, at 7:26 PM, Chris Jewell wrote:
Rick Ellison writes:
recommending that instead of authorizing only PSK-31 and Pactor-III,
that the FCC instead permit all publicly-documented data modes
So, has Pactor III every been publicly-documented???
Dave
K3DCW
Real radio bounces
with the basic rules. If this is the case,
then either the rules need to change, or the modes that don't comply need to be
removed from the air.
Thoughts?
Dave
On May 10, 2010, at 9:18 PM, Andy obrien wrote:
FYI, I plan to file a comment opposing the PIII on 60M proposal. My
objections
protection
Dave,
Using the WINMOR busy detector for Pactor sounds like a workable idea.
The WINMOR busy detector hasn't yet been integrated into other WL2K Pactor
Servers but it could be. The basic WINMOR TNC application (the virtual TNC)
has the function but would need to be integrated
Thanks, Rick.
I have suggested in the past that your SCAMP/WINMOR channel busy detector
could be inexpensively back-fit into WinLink PMBOs. Has anyone taken a look
at this?
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra
and automatic stations without busy detection by giving them
dedicated sub-bands would send a very clear message: the way to obtain
dedicated frequencies is to unrelentingly drive everyone else out of them.
Appeasement never works.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From
,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Simon HB9DRV
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:30 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Unattended narrow mode transmission protection
I've
AA6YQ comments below
-Original Message-
From: Jaak Hohensee [mailto:jaak.hohen...@eesti.ee]
Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 2:50 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Cc: Dave AA6YQ
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Unattended narrow mode transmission protection
Busy detection in case of QRP
, I'm going to be sure to send in my
two-cents worth.
Dave
K3DCW
On Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 6:48 AM, Andy obrien k3uka...@gmail.com wrote:
-- Forwarded message --
From: expeditionradio
Date: Tue, Apr 6, 2010 at 1:02 AM
Subject: [WINMOR] KQ6XA Recommendation IARU Region 2
Immediately, take me off of your mailing list
Weird language for a constitutional amendment. g
conveyed?
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
EPC runs a PSK63 contest, and the mode works quite well. Panoramic reception
and broadband decoding are a potent combination.
It's the only contest I've ever entered, and I took first place in NA, hi.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
signals.
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of g4ilo
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 1:54 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part
97
,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of g4ilo
Sent: Tuesday, March 09, 2010 6:59 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] Re: 1976 FCC - Delete all Emission Types from Part
97
I've heard this argument many
Unless you can convince the transceiver manufacturers to include the capability
in each unit, someone operating without a computer connected to his transceiver
– e.g. a phone operator -- will be unable to generate the “universal QRL”
signal.
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From
(unless the “Universal QRL signal” is something simple like “QRL” in CW, or
3-seconds of carrier at ~1 khz.)
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 11:55 AM
It’s more easily decoded than two handclaps in front of the microphone…
73,
Dave, 8P9RY
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Warren Moxley
Sent: Monday, March 08, 2010 2:25 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE
AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of rein...@ix.netcom.com
Sent: Saturday, March 06, 2010 5:50 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: ARRL/FCC Announcement about ROS
Hi Dave, ( AA6YQ
against you remember that 'you' are now
just one amongst many against him.
If the roles were reversed, how would 'you' feel against so many people
who were, or seemed to be, against you?
Dave (G0DJA)
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
However the source of this proof would have to come from someone other than
the ROS developer, who now has no credibility with the FCC whatsoever.
Is that what the FCC said, or is that just your opinion, Dave?
Dave (G0DJA)
AA6YQ comments below.
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Dave Ackrill
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:14 AM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] FCC on ROS post on ARRL website!
Dave AA6YQ wrote:
However
AA6YQ comments below
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of J. Moen
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 10:11 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [digitalradio] Re: Statement on Withdrawal of Support for ROS
(K3UK Sked Pages)
Dave
spread spectrum.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Rein A
Sent: Friday, March 05, 2010 3:16 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [digitalradio] What is SS?
Hello All,
I have been trying
KH6TY wrote:
Julian,
In the US, the RTTY/data segment of 20m stops at 14.150.
The current UK band plans can be found at
http://www.rsgb.org/spectrumforum/bandplans/
There's an online version and an Excel version that you can download.
Dave (G0DJA)
twisted into ROS is legal on HF, though.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of J. Moen
Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2010 1:04 PM
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [digitalradio] Re
http://www.arrl.org/news/stories/2010/03/04/11377/?nc=1
I take it you mean MARCH 6th?
--
Dave Sparks - AF6AS
- Original Message -
From: obrienaj k3uka...@gmail.com
To: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2010 2:16 PM
Subject: [digitalradio] ROS UHF net February 6 1230 UTC
I will be on 432.090 mHz this Saturday Feb 6
of the band plans in the UK by
reference to the RSGB website. I'm not sure why, but they never were
allowed to be posted.
I wonder if this will be allowed?
Dave (G0DJA)
. However the source of
this proof would have to come from someone other than the ROS developer, who
now has no credibility with the FCC whatsoever.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
-Original Message-
From: digitalradio@yahoogroups.com [mailto:digitalra...@yahoogroups.com]on
Behalf Of Rik
/ as of
a few minutes ago.
Note that all telephone conversations with FCC personnel are recorded.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
the message below.
73,
Dave, AA6YQ
From: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com
On Behalf Of Dave AA6YQ
Sent: Tuesday, March 02, 2010 4:08 PM
To: rosdigitalmodemgr...@yahoogroups.com Subject:
RE: [ROSDIGITALMODEMGROUP] Experimentation and Amateur Radio
1. The author publicly
1 - 100 of 1147 matches
Mail list logo
