in the list that created some dissent.
Ultimately, I believe it was decided they could participate; in fact, my
introduction to the list was from a trans woman.
Risker/Anne
On 2 October 2011 10:46, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
You can go here and look:
http://wikichix.org/wiki
and German, and I suspect it would
also apply to other languages. But in English Wikipedia content, we've
taken to using the term that the subject of an article uses to describe
herself.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
On 7 October 2011 12:03, Sydney Poore sydney.po...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Oct 7, 2011 at 11:37 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
I am saying that you are questioning the decision of an independent body
to select a person for membership in the same way that he questioned the WMF
to the moderation queue because of length.
Best,
Risker
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
difficult to put the genie back in the bottle, so to speak.
Nonetheless, if you'd like help trying to get stuff taken down, let me
know.
Risker/Anne
On 13 November 2011 18:47, Lika Tika likatikalikat...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Christine,
I'm so sorry this happened to you. Unfortunately, something
taught at least three people who went on to become
respected professional musicians, is not noteworthy.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
this in the early 1980s, and I
came away thinking that women artists were just as obsessed with female
genitalia as male artists.
Risker/Anne
On 6 December 2011 15:58, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes please!
I've yet to see it in person! :(
Sent via iPhone - I apologize
!), perhaps she could help the list to understand what the
intention was in including some of this information.
Risker/Anne
Risker/Anne
On 1 February 2012 10:41, Béria Lima beria.l...@wikimedia.pt wrote:
Again, I would like to point that meta is a wiki and all of us have
usernames there. So I
the inclusion of the word notable is important here. The
lists aren't just of women, they're of women who are notable enough to
qualify for a Wikipedia article - which is a pretty low bar, as anyone
who's ever tried to get some mess deleted already knows!
Risker/Anne
On 11 February 2012 13:05, Carol Moore DC carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
On 2/11/2012 12:35 PM, Risker wrote:
I do think the inclusion of the word notable is important here. The
lists aren't just of women, they're of women who are notable enough to
qualify for a Wikipedia article
to as the source of the image.
Of course, I don't go near Commons if I can avoid it - and I usually can -
so I'm not going to take up this fight. However, if *I* can see a problem
with an image copyright, there's probably a problem.
Risker/Anne
(And thanks to Andreas and whomever else removed the images
to you and the other moderators? Have you discussed your
proposed actions with the other moderators, so that you are all acting in
concert?
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
.
In particular, I do not want to see people denigrated for coming up with
ideas and brainstorming on this list, which I believe is where this post
about moderation has come from. It's not acceptable, regardless of whether
it comes from a woman or a man.
Risker/Anne
On 6 May 2012 18:37, Laura Hale la
for no apparent reason. We've also had people
mysteriously wind up on our moderation list when we definitely didn't add
them. (And for the record, I've not volunteered to moderate this list
because I already moderate half a dozen other ones.)
Risker/Anne
who
sleeps with whom.
Risker/Anne
On 9 May 2012 16:57, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
I've found that Wikipedia handles transgender issues fairly well. A good
example is the Chaz Bono article. This article is an example of what should
be the most problematic case on Wikipedia
to your new role, and thanks for taking it on.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
to get home and digest.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
, even if they are bringing a substantive issue to the
table.
I like the idea of Wikimedians supporting each other, in many different
ways, so I hope that good planning will help this list become a reality in
a form that helps women to participate in one or more of our projects.
Risker/Anne
not worry so much about what courts have decided, and pay more
attention to developing best practices within our own projects.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 31 May 2012 21:07, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 1:47 AM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Andreas - you seem to have the belief that the pervasive exposure to
pornography is having an adverse effect on community dynamics, and in
particular is having
Well, I've taken a look at the history and have identified BLP violations
going back to October 2011; as such, I've extended the existing
semi-protection for a full year. Some extensive cleanup has already taken
place, as well as some useful article expansion.
Risker/Anne
On 13 June 2012 02:04
there was
a serious external campaign happening.
Risker/Anne
On 15 June 2012 15:54, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
This case presents a good argument for flagged revisions. Given that the
people who made these edits weren't logged in, none of their additions and
changes would have been visible
the various WMF projects and with external media.
Risker/Anne
On 17 June 2012 21:58, Laura Hale la...@fanhistory.com wrote:
I think I brought this up in another post about developing a methodology
to determine this based on a number of offline conversations I was having.
As this might
were significant to us. It was really
fascinating to see the diversity in that!
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
the treatment of women/women's issues as less important than men/men's
issues.
http://sports.nationalpost.com/2012/07/29/london-2012-steps-toward-gender-equality-steps-backward-at-olympics/
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
.
Risker/Anne
On 1 August 2012 18:03, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Wed, Aug 1, 2012 at 9:16 AM, Sandra Ordonez sandratordo...@gmail.com
wrote:
the uk chairman band was mentioned in daily dot today
http://dly.do/M9K4Sv
Ugh, please, please, please just start a new thread from
Hi Sandra, I didn't mean that your posting it to this list was gossip, I
was referring to the initial news reports. It doesn't take a lot of
imagination to figure out that there was a secondary motive behind the
disclosure of this information to the press.
Risker/Anne
On 2 August 2012 00:54
--
Thanks, Sarah, for letting us know about this. And thank you to the list
moderators for revisiting the list's purpose and principles.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo
.
Risker/Anne
On 9 September 2012 17:10, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Don't forget, you can also add the category to any women you might know
who have Wikipedia articles and are Wikipedians.
Such as Sue or Valerie!
-Sarah
--
*Sarah Stierch*
*Wikimedia Foundation
the longstanding tradition that any category that refers to a
person's Wikipedia status/preference/etc is considered a user category
rather than an article category. I don't think the two should be mixed.
Risker/Anne
On 9 September 2012 18:25, Thomas Morton morton.tho...@googlemail.comwrote
that point in *any* WMF project), and none of them have anywhere near the
same degree of control of content.
Risker/Anne
On 13 October 2012 16:55, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
What I was most struck by was the hypocrisy: in Reddit's vision, freedom
of speech includes anonymously posting
, and swearing. Hmmm.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 17 January 2013 22:33, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
There was actually a good suggestion for one on the TFA talk pagefor
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sacred_Cod_of_Massachusetts
It's already at GA, needs significant polishing and filling in of gaps,
but is easily do-able
Yes, I get that part. I'm actually rather surprised by that, but then
again I don't know Sarah well enough to understand her perspective.
Risker/Anne
On 21 January 2013 21:42, Katherine Casey fluffernutter.w...@gmail.comwrote:
While I mostly agree with your take about the judgment being shown
to say that the unintentional typo in the title of this thread made
me *very* curious!
'
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Forwarding to this list, as this may be of interest to some of our readers
and regular participants.
Risker
-- Forwarded message --
From: Fae fae...@gmail.com
Date: 16 April 2013 11:29
Subject: [Wikimedia-l] Are you interested in being interviewed about your
LGBT experience
Michael, I have to say that I find your comment offensive. NOBODY expects
to be denigrated on Wikipedia, and being privileged is no excuse for
doing so. This is EXACTLY the kind of behaviour this list was created to
try to modify.
Risker/Anne
On 29 April 2013 22:35, Michael J. Lowrey orangem
On 29 April 2013 23:34, Michael J. Lowrey orangem...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 29, 2013 at 10:07 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Michael, I have to say that I find your comment offensive. NOBODY
expects to be denigrated on Wikipedia, and being privileged is no excuse
for doing so
Thanks, Sarah. I've got to ask...I've not seen some of those comments
before on the public lists, and I subscribe to most of them. Did I miss
something?
Risker/Anne
On 1 May 2013 11:12, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Please see below
via Matthew Roth at WMF.
Sue
of the Election Committee,
Risker
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
of thumb, images used in articles should be of subjects or
activities that are discussed in the article.
Risker/Anne
On 19 May 2013 13:08, Audrey Cormier cormier.h...@yahoo.ca wrote:
Roberta,
I'm afraid that I don't see where the directory aspect of policy is
related this. If images
and this article renamed to
sewing circles (lesbian groups) or something like that.
Risker/Anne
On 3 June 2013 03:32, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Where I expected to read about sewing circles and sewing bees...
I get an article about lesbian/bisexual actresses secretly having
Russavia is indefinitely blocked on enwiki, so perhaps recommending he post
this is not the best solution. However, anyone else can feel free to add
what they believe is relevant information to the project.
Risker/Anne
On 22 August 2013 06:35, Jodi Schneider jschnei...@pobox.com wrote:
Great
On 7 September 2013 10:49, Jeremy Baron jer...@tuxmachine.com wrote:
On Fri, Sep 6, 2013 at 5:31 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I keep hearing those excuses for performance problems, Jeremy. It
takes longer to serve up the original page here in North America on a
fast
. Frankly, this is
pretty much none of our business and is only notable where the subject says
it is.
Risker/Anne
On 25 October 2013 13:30, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
By the way, I started a proposal to change 'sex' to 'gender' back in May:
https://www.wikidata.org/wiki
It's controversial because there are women who assumed a male role, but
were definitely women in their personal life. So your definition there
would be to assign them the male gender but the female sex.
And I disagreewhat's being assigned there is sex, not gender.
Risker
On 25 October
into OTRS.
I think this comes down to some fundamental issues with filtering of spam
at the systems level, and it might be worthwhile to put in a bugzilla to
see if better spam filtering throughout the Mailman system can be added
in.
Risker/Anne
On 30 October 2013 11:59, Lane Rasberry l
for semi-protection if unregistered or newly registered
accounts start adding BLP-violating material.
Good luck.
Risker/Anne
On 4 December 2013 03:40, Rohini Lakshané roh...@wikimedia.in wrote:
This weekend I'm remotely participating in an edit-a-thon for editing
articles pertaining
knowledge.
Risker/Anne
On 26 February 2014 05:37, Lennart Guldbrandsson
l_guldbrands...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am writing a short (1500 word) text for the journal of current cultural
research, Culture Unbound (http://www.cultureunbound.ep.liu.se/index.html),
to be published in April
.
Oh dear. I agree with you Fluffernutter.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikipedia_Signpost/2014-06-04/Traffic_report
A thank you to Christine for the Maya Angelou article, and to Sage Ross
(with support from Awadewit) for the Rachel Carson article.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
to
ever pay attention to her again. I am really hoping you didn't intend that.
And Carol has a point. There are now more men posting to this thread than
there are women. And most of you have missed the point entirely. Heaven
help us from those who see themselves as our saviours.
Risker
On 23
Derric, if I may suggest - the best way to get a mailing list back on topic
is to write to the topic, not to remind people of the rules.
Risker/Anne
On 23 June 2014 11:49, Derric Atzrott datzr...@alizeepathology.com wrote:
I'm sorry Derric, but I think the topic of this thread is the notion
.
Some thoughts.
Risker/Anne
On 6 July 2014 04:51, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
I previously described my experience of being a member of Kevin Spacey's
Trigger Street Labs website
http://lists.wikimedia.org/pipermail/gendergap/2014-June/004388.html
I think part of my shock
by the
existence of the block log. Many of our most seriously problematic
sockpuppeting accounts are people who've been blocked for behavioural
reasons - and we waste a huge amount of time trying to keep them off the
site.
Risker/Anne
On 7 July 2014 03:20, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote
On 7 July 2014 09:51, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net wrote:
While I've barely had a chance to read through proposal and comments, I'd
like to just ask re the below which applies generally right now:
On 7/7/2014 9:35 AM, Risker wrote:
I know what it's like to have my inbox flooded
to one-off vandal accounts).
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
Frankly, I see little value in creating a site whose goal includes
attracting journalists - particularly given the poor quality,
sensationalistic journalism that we've all seen reporting on anything
Wikimedia.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 18:51, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote
in journalists to get things right.
Risker/Anne
On 11 September 2014 22:31, Andreas Kolbe jayen...@gmail.com wrote:
Anne,
That's precisely the point. A lot of journalism is badly researched,
because Wikipedia is remarkably opaque to many outside observers. So you
simply end up with people
-1451625788recno=55resultset=2format=Fnext=html/nffull.htmlbad=error/badfetch.htmlentitytoprecno=55entitycurrecno=55entityreturnTo=brief
Risker/Anne
On 22 October 2014 12:17, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi -
I actually professionally consult with GLAMs (galleries, libraries,
archives
Please moderate or even remove access to this list.
Risker
On 18 November 2014 16:52, Ryan Kaldari rkald...@wikimedia.org wrote:
Yeah, I don't see how this is at all relevant to the gender gap. Please
moderate the sender.
On Tue, Nov 18, 2014 at 1:27 PM, George Herbert george.herb
permission of those
individuals. Regardless of what any of us think of the specific editor who
is named, it behooves us all to act as we would expect to be treated - and
I'd be pretty ticked if someone published research that included examples
that identified me by name.
Risker/Anne
On 21 November
it, and we're going to group all obscenities together and use it
to slag off the guy we're ticked off with.
This isn't claimed to be journalism, it's claimed to be research, and it
needs to be held to a higher standard. The more I'm reading this, the more
I'm finding it problematic.
Risker/Anne
.
Risker/Anne
On 21 November 2014 16:41, Kevin Gorman kgor...@gmail.com wrote:
I don't think it's at all fair to characterize the section as an attempt
to rail on Eric. He just happens to have been at the center of the most
recent high profile controversy about the word - which means that quoting
of discretionary sanctions
effective at the close of the case, as well. [1] As if that will make any
difference.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Gender_Gap_Task_Force/Proposed_decision#Discretionary_sanctions
On 25 November 2014 at 20:14, LB
Check your spam folder and spam filters - many of us have had problems from
time to time with mailing list posts winding up in spam or junk.
Risker
On 29 November 2014 at 16:05, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
Okay, so this is the last message that I had in my e-mail inbox (it's from
4
. The same is true of many topics of interest to women:
abortion, marriage, gender identity, etc. Let's not simply dump all of
these in the men vs women drawer, please.
Risker/Anne
On 30 November 2014 at 08:12, Kathleen McCook klmcc...@gmail.com wrote:
Yes, one can see easily how they move from topic
I got one and promptly unsubscribed. I don't do google groups, and every
time someone has invited me to one, I've found they were not to my taste.
Risker/Anne
On 1 December 2014 at 02:08, Alison Cassidy coot...@mac.com wrote:
I didn't get one. Now, I feel cheated! :D
-- Allie
On Nov
of it being used in this manner before, although I'd heard and read
the term being used in a lot of other ways - including the validation for
including sex education in the school curriculum.
Risker
On 30 November 2014 at 16:13, Jim Hayes slowki...@gmail.com wrote:
in re: video - addressing the video
user is
gender-specific, such as German, Spanish, etc), even though I've been
openly female for most of my wiki-career. (I realise that it sounds like I
came out as being a woman...when I look back on the earliest years of
enwiki, there was a far less significant gender imbalance.)
Risker/Anne
nosedived, so we may be seeing the effects
of that reflected in the interest in voting, and even in the number and
quality of candidates. Back in the earlier days, there were often 30-40
candidates.
Risker/Anne
On 9 December 2014 at 11:08, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
On 12/9/2014 9
of the community to proactively
address these issues.
Again, I think you're caught in the trap of believing Arbcom has more power
and authority than it really has.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
https
this method out of proportion to the percentage of women
on the project - and in some ways it is an even greater insult because it's
hard to persuade others that what look like civil words are being used to
convey quite the opposite meaning.
Risker/Anne
Actually, GorillaWarfare was responding to the subject header. She is an
arbitrator. She is also expressing her opinion about why, as an
arbitrator, she has concerns about this list. I think she's bang on.
And I agree with Chris.
Risker/Anne
On 12 December 2014 at 14:08, Reguyla regu
Kumioko, you can change your gmail preferences to have this list
automatically dump to spam if you're not getting a fast enough response to
your unsubscribe.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 14:43, Reguyla regu...@gmail.com wrote:
While I am waiting for the email confirmation disenrolling me from
More likely, it is the fact that none of the moderators happen to be online
right now. If you want to leave the list, as is your stated intention, you
can go to your own Mailman preferences and decide which lists to
unsubscribe without waiting for a moderator.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 14
if your objective is not to participate on the list any
further.
It might be useful for the list moderators to consider changing the footer
message to include an unsubscribe link, as is done on several other
Wikimedia-hosted lists.
Risker
On 12 December 2014 at 15:19, regu...@gmail.com regu
It's just a reprint of the Slate article.
Risker/Anne
On 16 December 2014 at 11:09, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
http://www.sbs.com.au/news/article/2014/12/14/comment-will-editing-disputes-mean-end-wikipedia
--
Sarah Stierch
-
Diverse and engaging consulting
be arranged.
Risker/anne
On 18 December 2014 at 11:04, Chris Keating chriskeatingw...@gmail.com
wrote:
Hi Christina - this sounds very interesting - would you be happy for me to
propose it as a possible topic in the Wikimedia Conference, for which I'm
on the programme committee?
Chris
herself may not meet the threshold of notability,
just as Tomlinson himself did not meet the threshold.
Risker/Anne
On 23 December 2014 at 00:45, Neotarf neot...@gmail.com wrote:
Is Samira Salih al-Nuaimi notable?
Just looking for an example of an article about someone notable for only
one event
(or a journalist of any
kind, actually).
Oh, the irony. Carol, please don't ask people to put links to opinion
pieces written by banned editors into the Gendergap project. We all get
that you're really very angry right now, but this is not constructive.
Risker
/magazine/2014-the-lives-they-lived.html?module=SearchmabReward=relbias%3Ar_r=1
Risker/Anne
On 29 December 2014 at 17:25, Sarah Stierch sarah.stie...@gmail.com wrote:
+1 to that.
My tips are:
1) No talk pages if I can avoid it
2) Other channels (sorry people, but not all revolutions can take
more obvious because they outnumber us 10
to 1.
Risker/Anne
On 30 December 2014 at 09:57, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
As long as (mostly male) Wikipedia editors are allowed to insult and
harass editors whose edits they oppose for whatever reason Wikipedia cannot
retain women
at human
contact. Today, I wouldn't even get the templates, I bet; there's probably
an edit filter somewhere that will prevent me from making the edit in the
first place. Even if it's right.
Risker/Anne
On 30 December 2014 at 14:55, Marie Earley eir...@hotmail.com wrote:
I don't know how it goes
?
Risker/Anne
On 31 December 2014 at 10:31, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Is it simply impossible to start a Wikipedia project that's open to women,
or people who identify as women? (I'm sorry if I don't use the correct
terms, but I haven't kept up with them in recent years.)
I mean
pages of self-identified female editors on our German projects
uses the feminine term for user.) Not quite sure what the result is on
English Wikipedia - is there a list somewhere?
Risker/Anne
On 31 December 2014 at 10:59, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Well, I'm brainstorming, but yes
, in addition to the entire canvassing aspect.
There was once a Wikichix mailing list, moderated and very similar to the
one described by Lightbreather. It died a slow death several years ago
because, essentially, nobody really had much to say there, absent the
ability to discuss actual content.
Risker
been posted, Lightbreather; at least I've seen both of them.
Perhaps you've got preferences (either on Mailman or on Gmail) set so that
you don't get copies of your sent mails.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage
On 31 December 2014 at 11:52, Carol Moore dc carolmoor...@verizon.net
wrote:
The below definitely are interesting issues which deserve their own
thread. I kept reading the proposals but had not run into the
implementation very often.
On 12/30/2014 3:24 PM, Risker wrote:
Keep in mind
load, and am not
particularly interested in going to more venues, but I may be the exception.
Risker/Anne
On 1 January 2015 at 19:49, LB lightbreath...@gmail.com wrote:
Thank you, Heather! This is what we run into on the WP GGTF every time we
open something up for discussion.
All I wanted
Wikilove in every edit
summary, which I find really creepy.
Risker/Anne
On 5 February 2015 at 05:04, Jane Darnell jane...@gmail.com wrote:
Well Jonathan, thanks for doing that! I am not an administrator, so I
couldn't do those things you mentioned, but I often think that in some
cases I wish I could
.
RIsker/ANne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
On 16 January 2015 at 17:13, Heather Walls hwa...@wikimedia.org wrote:
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:56 PM, Risker risker...@gmail.com wrote:
Whatever else cis is, it's not a scientific term. It's a buzzword that
sounds scientific because it derives from the Latin, but in fact it's a
coined
should
seriously consider participating actively in these elections[1] and the
annual review of current stewards [2] that happens concurrently.
Risker/Anne
[1] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Elections_2015
[2] https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Stewards/Confirm/2015
an effect in retaining new women
editors as new men editors. But it's not counted as a gender gap activity.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IdeaLab/Inspire_Grants_%E2%80%93_Gender_gap_campaign
[2]
https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Grants:IEG/Reimagining_Wikipedia_Mentorship
Just copy-pasting this from another thread on Wikimedia-L, where similar
events are happening in relation to members of that list:
I think it will be better if most of us can Report the Group.
Yes, please do this. We're also talking with Google about trying to resolve
the issue, but my
articles that don't currently exist.
Risker/Anne
___
Gendergap mailing list
Gendergap@lists.wikimedia.org
To manage your subscription preferences, including unsubscribing, please visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/gendergap
, and there's a
recognition that some are going to be successful, while others (even if
they look good on paper) are not going to produce results. The key is
ensuring that there is some learning derived from the experiments. Don't
be afraid to try something!
Risker/Anne
that there will be
some editor retention out of this one.
Much to my surprise, I realised that this was the largest Wiki*edia event I
had attended outside of Wikimania. It bodes well for both the Canadian
editing community, and for the narrowing of the gender gap.
Risker/Anne
[1]
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki
FYI
-- Forwarded message --
From: Gregory Varnum gregory.var...@gmail.com
Date: 20 April 2015 at 18:59
Subject: [Wikitech-l] Nominations being accepted for 2015 Wikimedia
Foundation elections
To: Wikimedia developers wikitec...@lists.wikimedia.org
Greetings,
I am pleased to
1 - 100 of 150 matches
Mail list logo
