I like my Xacti! I expect you are looking for a Windows solution?
I would use MP4Cam2Avi to make mp4 into avi. Then I'd import into
Virtualdub and fiddle with the framerate settings. I have not needed
to do this, but I'm confident it will work. You can export frames as
well as AVI files. Good
I actually ended up stopping by this site a few days ago.
I think it was mentioned in some article i read.
Funny thing is, they have the exact same tagline as one of the sites I
worked on.
But yeah, they are giving you attribution but they are definately re-hosting
a newly transcoded flv file:
They seem to be giving attribution and providing direct download links
to the original file ... downloads will hit blip for stats and links
will hit feedburner and what not ... but the transcoding still bugs
me. I wonder why these sites are so determined to eat up their own
hosting/bandwidth
I think its in part because they want to assure all videos on their site are
flash in order to avoid playback issues with users... and also it provides
them with some deeper viewing stats as well.
They are using on2 flix http://on2.com/technology/flix-features/
They are using their bandwidth.
In the gold rushes the people who got rich were the ones selling pans and
shovels, not the panners. People who are out to make a buck on the back of
another will always be able find a way to do that. I don't respect them,
but I accept them. Like I accept the existence of bacteria in my
This Saturday, 4/14/07, FlashMeeting is about to happen. The time for
entry is 10am - noon PST USA, 1pm - 3pm EST USA, 17:00-19:00 GMT.
Enter through this link:
http://flashmeeting.open.ac.uk/fm/f27ca7-8054
You may also check the FlashMeeting page at
http://flashmeeting.cirne.com for future and
Blip's ads do not play through.
That's a factor...
Jan
On 4/14/07, Adam Quirk, Wreck Salvage [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In the gold rushes the people who got rich were the ones selling pans and
shovels, not the panners. People who are out to make a buck on the back of
another will always be
when posting a podcast wich format should I use?
.swf
quicktime
ipod converted file
apple tv format?
other?
How can I convert a swf file to these formats?
thanks
I blogged about it here:
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/03/mike-hudacks-rules-for-
video-sharing.html
or
http://tinyurl.com/2pvyg9
And posted their initial response:
Update from Pyro.tv via Roxanne:
I understand the importance of tracking views and data. We will be
soon releasing
Speaking of settings,
Does anyone know of a program (on PC) that allows bitrate manipulation
of h.264 codec MP4s in 640x480? I have quicktime pro but you cant go
640x480 AND manipulate bitrate that I can figure out because they
don't have simple profile yet just base.
Rev. Chumley
You have to think about the people who are coming to your site. The
majority will be Windows users. However, you will also have Mac and
Linux users as well. You also have to decide on the video quality and
portability issues, i.e. do you want folks to download/share.
Not all of your viewers will
Hmm, I seem to be able to do it ok in QT Pro on my PC.
(There is a settings button where you can set all the h.264 settings,
but you have to then click an entirely different size button to set
the size).
I'll try to create a video w/ these settings on my PC today and out it
online somewhere.
On
i also got a response from them saying what sull had said
that they transcode so it's a more reliable playback experience...
Ryanne - I'll have your channel removed as soon as possible. Just an FYI,
I
understand that transcoding and hosting is an issue, but we decided to go
ahead with it because
Den 14.04.2007 kl. 16:40 skrev Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I would not consider an .avi which is an older codec, lesser quality
and is a huge honking sized file. The Apple TV format is so new that
there is no bases of users. You can be one of the first but how many
people have an Apple TV?
AVI
thank you,
If I chose to go with .swf would that work for Apple TV, ipod and most
everything
necessary for podcast?
Otherwise, how can I convert a .swf to quicktime?
Daryl
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Gena [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You have to think about the people who are coming to your
.swf files are actually flash video or flash animation files, exported
with player code so that it is viewable in the browser using Flash
Player. .swf also allows for some interactivity, with clickable
hyperlinks, jumping around in the video or animation, etc. As an
ouput for video I dislike it
MasamiBillShow has been translated into Japanese and Haitian Creole:
http://dotsub.com/films/masamibillshow001/index.php
Join dotsub.com if you'd like to add other languages.
--
Bill C.
http://BillCammack.com
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Bill Cammack [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
MasamiBillShow
well, you have hit on a couple of my concerns.
When I export out of flash as a quicktime movie I loose the sound track of the
imported
and embeded quicktime movie. Any ideas why this is happening?
Some may not know this, but you can publish quicktime, but the export
quicktime
video is a
Long live blip.tv. I agree, their strategy of offering the flv
permalink sets them apart in a world of vieo hosting options. And
with that single link, we videobloggers have a whole host of other fun
things we can do with our content.
(This has been an unpaid and sincerely honest endorsement.)
Then what about magnify.net? I haven't looked closely at how they
aggregate videos...can anyone enlighten me?
Carter
CrowdAbout.us
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steve Garfield [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I blogged about it here:
http://offonatangent.blogspot.com/2007/03/mike-hudacks-rules-for-
Daryl
Just checking in for a second and no chance to test, but see:
http://tinyurl.com/2nqbj3
Which is the Flash 8 Documentation file:
Using Flash Publishing Publishing Flash documents Specifying
publish settings for QuickTime videos
Particularly this paragraph:
Select Streaming Sound to
We had our stuff removed last month and we're working through partners
to get them to realize that reencoding is not cool.
-K
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], ryanne hodson
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i also got a response from them saying what sull had said
that they transcode so it's a more reliable
I had so many issues with swf, I quit using them altogether, so I'm
pulling this out of ancient history... Quicktime and swf are
intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the quicktime
wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something.
Someone, please feel free to
Hey David,
Thanks for looking into that, oh but let me clarify. I need the
resulting MP4 with h.264 codec to be 640x480 and iPod compatable.
I could of course use the m4v export to ipod option but my show is
very very long (usually 1 hour 30 mins)and the straight export make
the file size WAY
Den 14.04.2007 kl. 19:06 skrev caroosky [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
intermingled somehow. I think quicktime uses an swf in the quicktime
wrapper when making things clickable in the video. Or something.
No.
--
Andreas Haugstrup Pedersen
URL: http://www.solitude.dk/
I took the original quicktime movie i had, and stripped out the sound track
using Sound
Studio, a nice cheap sound editing program.
Then I imported the seperate sound track into flash and exported it is a
QuickTime Video.
That worked. The quicktime now has he audio.
With the sound track, a
join us!
I took the original quicktime movie i had, and stripped out the sound track
using Sound
Studio, a nice cheap sound editing program.
Then I imported the seperate sound track into flash and exported it is a
QuickTime Video.
That worked. The quicktime now has he audio.
With the sound track, a
hmm Im not sure I understand. Do you not see the limit bitrate option
in the h.264 settings? Or are you saying that regarless of the
bitrate settings the standard h.264 codec in windows QTPro cant be
ipod compatabe?
I've not done alot of testing ... just been clicking around in the
options
Hey Everyone, just wanted to let all you bay area people know about the
concert we'll be having this Monday night at the Brava Theatre to
celebrate my release. David Rovics will be performing as will Emcee Lynx
w/ Beltaines Fire, and also the Molotov Mouths. For more information,
e-mail me or
Now Scoble:
http://www.ustream.tv/watch/channel/n6m2nBTlCbmJHPL0,I51JQ
In Canada, the CRTC is the equivalent to the FCC (in the US), so this
is TERRIBLE NEWS:
http://www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/04/13/crtc-review.html
The CRTC are the creators of a crappy thing called CanCon (Canadian
Content) which forces broadcasters to play a large percentage of
Canadian
http://videopancakes.blogspot.com/2007/04/awful-things.html
http://videopancakes.blogspot.com/2007/04/awful-things.html
--- In [EMAIL PROTECTED], Kent Nichols
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This was really advice to Short Story authors, but i think it also
applies to thos of us that are striving to
Its good to be concerned about this stuff, thanks for posting about
it. Luckily I dont think its quite as bad as it sounds. Ive read the
following very boring document to get some detail on what they might
be looking at exactly:
http://www.crtc.gc.ca/archive/ENG/Hearings/2007/n2007-5.htm
You are
I'm hoping to move to Canada next year, so this makes my buttocks
tighten even more.
I don't see how they could regulate it in the same way, but time to
organize and make your/our voices heard right now, I guess.
Rupert
http://twittervlog.blogspot.com/
http://www.twitter.com/ruperthowe/
On
I think the confusion centres around this bit I have quicktime pro
but you cant go 640x480 AND manipulate bitrate that I can figure out
because they don't have simple profile yet just base
Unless something has changed recently and Im out of date, it is
baseline profile that you want to select to
I created a Facebook group called Canadians for New Media Freedom here:
http://www.facebook.com/group.php?gid=2319008732
In all honesty, I don't care about trying to highlight Canadian
voices... I believe you'll find your audience if people like you, so
why force Canadian content on Canadians?
Oh I do agree that it could be a foot in the door. Its just really
unclear how far that sort of censorship will go on the internet in the
future, by any country.
Do you know specifically what current regulation would prevent
sexually suggestive or ass-rape jokes from being done by you if they
That's absolutely my concern, too. And even if your content isn't
censored as such, I'd be worried that you'd be subject to
bureaucratic bullshit - having to get your content Rated, forcing
users to confirm they're over a certain age, confirming the %age of
your production team and
By reencoding footage they are on extremely rocky legal ground.
They are actively redistributing content, and so they absolutely must
adhere to peoples license. They cant try and wriggle around in the
grey area that some who only embed videos have over this issue in the
past.
They are also most
From my limited knowledge as an outsider, Candas style of legislation
looks to me like a cross between the wider EU way of doing things,
some stuff that seems quite a bit stronger, similar to France and
their sense of strong promotion of one national culture by government.
with the close
Oops sorry I didnt mean to typo Canada.
Found an article from some years back when there was some focus on
much the same issue:
http://www.articledashboard.com/Article/The-CRTC---the-Internet--Forbidden-Domain/176409
Im not sure Id agree with its use of that strange child pron case
judgement as
I don't understand myself at times.
I posted two pieces at once.
Excuse me.
I apologize for stepping up like this.
I have no idea what's come over me.
Probably the free Jamba Juice coupon I got in the mail today.
http://x.nnon.tv/reasonable_illusions/2007/04/merry_go_round.html
Baseline works fine in h.264 320x240 for ipods, but baseline profile
in 640x480 h.264 is not ipod compatable at any bitrate. In order for
it to be ipod compatable at 640x480 it has to be in the new Simple
h.264 profile.
I've tried every bitrate I can think of in h.264 with baseline profile
but
44 matches
Mail list logo
