On 31 May 2018, at 19:15, Richard Hipp wrote:

> But more recently, mobile phone designers are telling me things like
> "try to keep the size under 5 megabytes, if you can, please."
>
> Based on those more recent conversations, I'm thinking that we have
> more headroom that we have had historically, and so I have recently
> been allowing new features to start creeping into the core.

Size matters IMO, it’s a sign of good design and less is more WRT errors etc.


> Size is still important.  But having useful features is important too.

True, and we all know that most features are not used. Do you have an idea what 
features are used by ratio? Maybe adding a „report back feature collector“ 
might be an idea, for those wanting to support the feature selection process.


> I'm continuing to work to find the right balance between these
> competing goals.

Keeping things configurable as it is, is a very good approach, please keep it.

-- 

Robert M. Münch, CEO
M: +41 79 65 11 49 6

Saphirion AG
smarter | better | faster

http://www.saphirion.com
http://www.nlpp.ch

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
sqlite-users mailing list
sqlite-users@mailinglists.sqlite.org
http://mailinglists.sqlite.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/sqlite-users

Reply via email to