well, I still think that the synth patch on these both youtube clips
comes from the
exact same source. that is, a preset or something, on the stuff they
used. and no,
its no modular synth. no its not beefy analog. because most of the
stuff used were
on the cheap side. or gotten cheap. . Im thinking this would be some
kind of sampler
patch or something in that direction. ,, surely someone has dug into
this before.
listen to the clips again, name that synth ,, thats what controlling
my brain atm.
On 12 jul 2010, at 16.10, kent williams wrote:
I think that I'd classify that as an analog string sound, which I'd
try to approximate using pulse width modification of a square wave,
then run it into a chorus + reverb. I don't think that Neil was
borrowing Jeff's synth. They both used similar sounds and then did
similar (but not the same) sort of pitch bending action.
It's a case of form following function. They both needed a string
synth sound, and both being Detroit dudes, they both gravitated
towards the same kind of sound.
Now that I've done my forensic analysis I must say that I really love
both pieces, and when I listen to them, normally, I'm not trying to
recreate their patches on my Jupiter 6 ;-)
On Mon, Jul 12, 2010 at 8:14 AM, Daniel Troberg
<erasemu...@gmail.com> wrote:
what In g*ds name is that patch ?? the pitching string sound, , or
did neil
just borrow jeffs synth ?? its eeerie ,,,
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l4nWhISpc4E&feature=related
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppJPQ3xsKWI
