on 2/16/03 5:47 PM, Dan Sicko at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:

> 
> On Sunday, February 16, 2003, at 05:48 PM, spw wrote:
> 
>> That doesn't equate to techno.
> 
> Let's just agree to disagree.

I agree to disagree with your disagreements.

> I've said the word means something
> different to every person you might ask, and that's obviously the case
> here.

I disagree, even though there is a wide assortment of electronic music on
the market (some deviations of
Detroit techno) people obviously distinguish the techno genre from other
electronic music genres
discussed on the 313 list and they associate the techno name with certain
artist like Ben Sims, Surgen,
DJ Rush, Robert Hood (M-Plant) not Environ, Moodyman.
Subscribe to the Hardwax and Sonic Groove mailing stock list and read how
they describe the records.
This is an observation based on the hard facts/ scientific evidence, not
just someones personal opinion on
what they think techno should sound like because they do not like the
current techno genre.
 
>> Detroit techno is like an endangered species with a dwindling
>> population.
> 
> Only because the species refuses to evolve, or rather, those interested
> fail to see where evolution has occurred.
> 
> Why can't people see past tracks (however brilliant and groundbreaking)
> that were made decades ago?
> 
> -d

Maybe you should ask that question to the Ghetto bass and Detroit electro
producers who's sound
pre-dates Detroit techno.
If you go back in a time machine and show someone the latest Detroit electro
record like Erzats Audio
(which aspires to sound like Vince Clarke, early DM, Yazzo) or Ghostly Int.
and a techno 
record from the year 2003 like the latest one from Adam Bayer, which style
is going 
to sound more futuristic to that person in the 80's?
Obviously the techno record by Adam Bayer, to them Ghetto Bass is just going
to sound 
like Miami Bass and Detroit electro records like the ones I just mentioned
are going to remind them of
early 80's synth pop/ dance music.
Now why do you think other forms of dance music which are older than techno
like 'house', 
'disco', 'funk', and 'jazz' are more socially acceptable in the dance music
community and 
techno is considered taboo?
Because techno was the hype over a decade ago and is no longer trendy,
certain 313 artist are
obviously becoming more conservative, inspired by older music or comforming
to the latest electronica music trends.


Reply via email to