On Thu, 20 Nov 2003 20:02:00 -0000, "Phonopsia" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote :
> Scotto - I dunno why you had so much trouble jackin' about with it. I think > it works great, and you should see Ryan Blackman give that muv a workout! > Certainly doesn't inhibit him any. > well i'm used to a very simple mixer, i own a stanton sk-2f. 2 channel, 3 band 3 eq, adjustable volume curve, adjustable cross fader curve, kill switches. a scratch mixer, even though i dont scratch. so when i jump on the beast and have no monitors, playing in a concrete box and have never used the mixer before. yea it was hell. it is the only time i have used said mixer. maybe if i was able to use it before hand a couple of times, because it is hard to use a new mixer the first time you really dont know what to expect, like how the curves are set, how the eq's cut (A&H has great eq's), how much the trim boosts, etc. but this went beyond that to where i felt like a total doofus. it distracted me so much it made it had to concentrate, plus the no monitor. > Didn't we just have this debate last month? Ultimately, you aren't gonna > convince anyone. Everyone has their preference. But us A&H users know we're > right and the rest of you are missing out. ;) For the record, I've used the > Pioneers almost as much as the A&H, and I do like them both - but the A&H is > a much better sounding and feeling beast IMO. Plus it's built like a f*cking > tank. > not a big fan of pioneer mixers, the sound, sounds like it is struggling to get out of the mixer. I swear my stanton has a better sound quality and is a quarter of the price. but i can see where you are comig from with the A&H. i just would not buy the 32 i can not forgive the desinger, what the hell was that person thinking? we will make the only mixer where its a pain in the ass to get at the trim knobs and if it is mounted and the back is closed off you can not even get at them.
