But then I'd probably suggest that the person who says "techno without 4/4 
beats is just breaks" is as definition-obsessed as anyone...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2004 15:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe 
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
> 
> 
> I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural, 
> healthy way of course.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:35 PM
> To: Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe 
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> And of course then we must examine what you refer to as "This"
> 
> and quite possibly why you insist on using "*" instead of "_"
> 
> MEK
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                             
>                       "Brendan Nelson"                        
>                                                             
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                              
>                       ine.co.uk>               cc:            
>                                                             
>                                                Subject:  RE: 
> Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the   
>                       03/04/04 09:28 AM         Original Hot 
> Mix 5)                                                       
>                                                               
>                                                             
>                                                               
>                                                             
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 March 2004 15:25
> >
> > >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being 
> a bunch of
> > definition obsessed trainspotters.
> >
> > I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed...
> 
> This obviously depends on what exactly we *mean* by "definition
> obsessed"...
> 
> Brendan
> 
> 
> 
> ##############################################################
> #######################
> Note:
> 
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent 
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless 
> specifically stated. This email 
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have 
> received this email in 
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thank You.
> ##############################################################
> #######################
> 
> 

Reply via email to