>>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being a bunch of definition obsessed trainspotters. I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed - more like a slightly unhealthy preoccupation with objects and figures that nobody else really cares for. And, I'm sorry, but I have to disagree with you about you finding it "funny". Entertaining maybe - perplexing possibly - deviant most likely - but "funny" it is not. just my 2ยข MEK
- Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe stor... Dan Bean
- Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe... Martin
- RE: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe... Robert Taylor
- RE: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe... Cobert, Gwendal
- Re: RE: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Dan Bean
- RE: RE: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno... Ken Odeluga
- Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno... robin
- Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno... Michael Lees
- Re: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Dan Bean
- Re: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Michael . Elliot-Knight
- RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Brendan Nelson
- RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Michael . Elliot-Knight
- RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Robert Taylor
- RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Brendan Nelson
- RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wa... Robert Taylor