Anyone who posts on a messageboard is either obsessed or bored at work: I'm both

-----Original Message-----
From: Brendan Nelson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:35 PM
To: Robert Taylor; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the
Original Hot Mix 5)


But then I'd probably suggest that the person who says "techno without 4/4 
beats is just breaks" is as definition-obsessed as anyone...

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Taylor [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 04 March 2004 15:36
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe 
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
> 
> 
> I think people here ARE obsessed, but in a perfectly natural, 
> healthy way of course.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 04, 2004 3:35 PM
> To: Brendan Nelson
> Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: RE: Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe 
> story of the
> Original Hot Mix 5)
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> And of course then we must examine what you refer to as "This"
> 
> and quite possibly why you insist on using "*" instead of "_"
> 
> MEK
> 
> 
>                                                               
>                                                             
>                       "Brendan Nelson"                        
>                                                             
>                       <[EMAIL PROTECTED]        To:       
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>                                              
>                       ine.co.uk>               cc:            
>                                                             
>                                                Subject:  RE: 
> Re: (313) Big Chill vs Detroit Techno (wasThe story of the   
>                       03/04/04 09:28 AM         Original Hot 
> Mix 5)                                                       
>                                                               
>                                                             
>                                                               
>                                                             
> 
> 
> 
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 04 March 2004 15:25
> >
> > >>It is funny, but then they probably laugh at us for being 
> a bunch of
> > definition obsessed trainspotters.
> >
> > I wouldn't exactly say that we are definition obsessed...
> 
> This obviously depends on what exactly we *mean* by "definition
> obsessed"...
> 
> Brendan
> 
> 
> 
> ##############################################################
> #######################
> Note:
> 
> Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do 
> not necessarily represent 
> those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless 
> specifically stated. This email 
> and any files transmitted are confidential and intended 
> solely for the use of the 
> individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have 
> received this email in 
> error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> 
> Thank You.
> ##############################################################
> #######################
> 
> 

#####################################################################################
Note:

Any views or opinions are solely those of the author and do not necessarily 
represent 
those of Channel Four Television Corporation unless specifically stated. This 
email 
and any files transmitted are confidential and intended solely for the use of 
the 
individual or entity to which they are addressed. If you have received this 
email in 
error, please notify [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Thank You.
#####################################################################################

Reply via email to