now i'm confused. did my missive on why history is wack ever make it to the list?
do i have to do a profanity check again? On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > did i direct that to you? > > sorry > > it was meant for the list > > > > > On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Yussel wrote:>, 7 Oct 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > >If you wanted to reach a younger, less-educated crowd with the intention > > > of giving them some insight in the history >of the music, how would you > > go > > > about? > > > > OI! > > > > I didn't say that. > > > > *pokes Yussel in the eye* > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________ > > > > --------------------- End of message text -------------------- > > > > Is your business ready for the new era of accounting? http://www.ifrs.co.uk > > > > ---------------------------------------------------------------- > > This e-mail is sent by the above named in > > their individual, non-business capacity and > > is not on behalf of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. > > > > PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP may monitor > > outgoing and incoming e-mails and other > > telecommunications on its e-mail and > > telecommunications systems. By replying > > to this e-mail you give your consent to such monitoring. > > > > >
