> -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas D. Cox, Jr. [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 23 November 2004 00:10 > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: RE: (313) ugly edits (full detail) > > just to be annoying
Success!!! ;) > but thats not the point. i actually wonder if maybe theres a > digital stage in the mastering/pressing process that is > making certain things sound bad. Could be it. Omar S 4 definitely sounds like digital clipping. All I know is that *most* Detroit House tracks don't sound like that, but a disproportionate number of those that do come from Theo Parrish. If he just gets a bad luck when it comes time to press them up, it would seem he's very unlucky, because as I understand it he's got control over the product up until the time it gets there. Also, I'm struggling to think of a Theo Parrish track that sounds like a crappy recording that *isn't* on Sound Signature (or the Ugly Edits). His Third Ear and Peacefrog stuff sounds wicked. Just saying there seems to be a lack of quality control either when it comes time to 'ok' the recordings or approve the test presses, and I would assume there's only one person in charge of that at Sound Signature. Hope I'm not sounding like a hater, it's just that as a music lover myself, I love the hear the music - not the limitations of the medium. Tristan ======= http://www.phonopsia.co.uk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
