i disagree. eps and 12"s cos the same price, so who cares how many tracks are on there? it's about quality, not quantity. some of my favorite records have a track on side A and side B is the instrumental of side A. i'd rather 2 good tracks on a 12" or EP than 4 tracks just so it can be said "there's four tracks here". andrew duke ps ditto for albums; albums used to have 6 or 8 tracks, sometimes just 4 long ones, but you'll find the quality was higher. today, especially with cds, artists often jam up cds to 74 + minutes and some of it is filler because of this. if they did 40 minute LPs and 40 min cds, the quality might be higher. again, i'd rather 40 mins of good music on an LP, than 78 minutes comprised of 40 min good and 38 mins filler "just to make it 78 minutes". quality always wins over quantity.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Just a thought, > > I'm not sure what anyone else thinKs, but I get really annoyed and feel > somewhat ripped off when an artist realeases an EP with only two tracks (the > two that broke the camels back today where the latest releases from Joey > Beltram and KDJ, moods and grooves) Both Artist offer great quality and in > fact both the tracks on the KDJ release where good, one of the Beltram tracks > was a little weak, but the other was really good and fresh for Joey. > > however, I get the feeling that when an artist releases an EP with only two > tracks on it that a) they don't have any other material or b)they're trying > to cash in! or both! > > Am I right? > > WorkZ > > -------------------- > talk21 your FREE portable and private address on the net at > http://www.talk21.com -- Cognition/Andrew Duke's In The Mix mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://techno.ca/cognition 1096 Queen St #123 Halifax NS Canada B3H 2R9
