I replied to Stewart's mail, sorry I didn't include any of his in my reply. he was in the to: field though, thought that would be enough to identify what I meant.
On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 21:01, rob webb wrote: > > who's testy? ;) > > that's fair enough tho. i responded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s email because he > raised a coupla points that i disagree with and, frankly, felt were > unreasonable. i apologise if my comments have been a little sarcastic in > tone at times. it's something i can't shake, much like biting my nails, > swearing and eating fried eggs (not all at the same time i hasten to add). > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]