I replied to Stewart's mail, sorry I didn't include any of his in my
reply.  he was in the to: field though, thought that would be enough to
identify what I meant.



On Tue, 2002-03-12 at 21:01, rob webb wrote:

> 
> who's testy? ;)
> 
> that's fair enough tho.  i responded to [EMAIL PROTECTED]'s email because he 
> raised a coupla points that i disagree with and, frankly, felt were 
> unreasonable.  i apologise if my comments have been a little sarcastic in 
> tone at times.  it's something i can't shake, much like biting my nails, 
> swearing and eating fried eggs (not all at the same time i hasten to add).
> 
> 

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to