LOL! You don't have to read it mate! Chill. There are bigger problems in this world aren't there? :)
-----Original Message----- From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:40 PM To: Odeluga, Ken Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview) I disagree. I don't have any interest in reading about podcast laws and regulations. The original post was about a specific detroit related thing that I wanted to keep track of for later, but now i have to read a new email that has nothing to do with the op every time somebody replies. A subject change would easily fix this, and it's just good netiquette. On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No big deal really - it's still related to the event, which was in > itself pretty unusual, as the post below points out. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:32 PM > To: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad > Mike interview) > > > people on this list need to learn how to change the subject lines > accordingly when the original intent of the post is lost. > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> BBC do exactly the same thing for podcasts of previously recorded >> radio shows. A podcast is a download, not listened to live, it's not >> a > >> performance licence that's required by Radio NZ. UR needs to be able >> to collect for the use of their material from the listener, from the >> downloader. And as RNZ aren't in the business of selling music, and >> UR > >> aren't giving it away, all they can do is make available for downlaod >> the material that they own the copyright to, which is the chat, not >> the music. I think it's it's amazing he was interviewed at all by the >> state broadcaster...I can't see BBC1 giving him 30 minutes during any >> given day. >> >> essentially it's the listener who needs to > This proves once again >> how NZ takes America's most trumped-up >>> regulations and makes them worse. >>> >>> I know there are geeks in the house who will enjoy Peter Gutmann's >>> classic story about NZ regulation in the 1990s of "digital >>> munitions," otherwise known as cryptographic keys, or, "my life as a >>> Kiwi arms courier." >>> >>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/courier.html >>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/wass99.html >>> >>> fh >>> >>> >>> ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------ >>> >>> To: 313@hyperreal.org >>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Andy Mitchell> >>> Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview >>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:20:16 +1200 (NZST) >>> >>>>> They won't let you waiver - music is music to mcps/prs etc and >>>>> they > >>>>> do close people down for it. >>>> >>>> This is a New Zealand site remember, so it's controlled by local >>>> organisation RIANZ not any American organisation. I'm guessing >>>> their > >>>> fees are equally prohibitive though, because *no-one* offers >>>> podcasts or even streaming archived shows here unless they consist >>>> purely of talk. >>> >>> So I did some snooping and the local situation is this (turned out >>> it > >>> was an organisation called Phonographic Performances New Zealand who >>> control broadcast licenses here): >>> >>>> PPNZ does not have an existing assignment to blanket licence >>>> podcasts at the present time. Any broadcaster seeking to make >>>> available music on demand is required to seek the permission of the >>>> individual copyright owners concerned. >>> >>> So it's more or less impossible to archive music radio online from >>> here!Madness... >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> > > > > -- > peace, > > frank > > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com > -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
