LOL!

You don't have to read it mate! Chill. There are bigger problems in this
world aren't there? :)

-----Original Message-----
From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:40 PM
To: Odeluga, Ken
Cc: 313@hyperreal.org
Subject: Re: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad
Mike interview)


I disagree.  I don't have any interest in reading about podcast laws and
regulations.  The original post was about a specific detroit related
thing that I wanted to keep track of for later, but now i have to read a
new email that has nothing to do with the op every time somebody
replies.  A subject change would easily fix this, and it's just good
netiquette.

On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> No big deal really - it's still related to the event, which was in 
> itself pretty unusual, as the post below points out.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:32 PM
> To: 313@hyperreal.org
> Subject: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad 
> Mike interview)
>
>
> people on this list need to learn how to change the subject lines 
> accordingly when the original intent of the post is lost.
>
> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> BBC do exactly the same thing for podcasts of previously recorded 
>> radio shows. A podcast is a download, not listened to live, it's not 
>> a
>
>> performance licence that's required by Radio NZ. UR needs to be able 
>> to collect for the use of their material from the listener, from the 
>> downloader. And as RNZ aren't in the business of selling music, and 
>> UR
>
>> aren't giving it away, all they can do is make available for downlaod

>> the material that they own the copyright to, which is the chat, not 
>> the music. I think it's it's amazing he was interviewed at all by the

>> state broadcaster...I can't see BBC1 giving him 30 minutes during any

>> given day.
>>
>>  essentially it's the listener who needs to > This proves once again 
>> how NZ takes America's most trumped-up
>>> regulations and makes them worse.
>>>
>>> I know there are geeks in the house who will enjoy Peter Gutmann's 
>>> classic story about NZ regulation in the 1990s of "digital 
>>> munitions," otherwise known as cryptographic keys, or, "my life as a

>>> Kiwi arms courier."
>>>
>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/courier.html
>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/wass99.html
>>>
>>> fh
>>>
>>>
>>> ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------
>>>
>>> To: 313@hyperreal.org
>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Andy Mitchell>
>>> Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview
>>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:20:16 +1200 (NZST)
>>>
>>>>> They won't let you waiver - music is music to mcps/prs etc and 
>>>>> they
>
>>>>> do close people down for it.
>>>>
>>>> This is a New Zealand site remember, so it's controlled by local 
>>>> organisation RIANZ not any American organisation. I'm guessing 
>>>> their
>
>>>> fees are equally prohibitive though, because *no-one* offers 
>>>> podcasts or even streaming archived shows here unless they consist 
>>>> purely of talk.
>>>
>>> So I did some snooping and the local situation is this (turned out 
>>> it
>
>>> was an organisation called Phonographic Performances New Zealand who

>>> control broadcast licenses here):
>>>
>>>> PPNZ does not have an existing assignment to blanket licence 
>>>> podcasts at the present time. Any broadcaster seeking to make 
>>>> available music on demand is required to seek the permission of the

>>>> individual copyright owners concerned.
>>>
>>> So it's more or less impossible to archive music radio online from 
>>> here!Madness...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> peace,
>
> frank
>
> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
>



-- 
peace,

frank

dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com

Reply via email to