Whatever. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 1:06 PM To: Odeluga, Ken Cc: 313@hyperreal.org Subject: Re: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview)
It's a matter of educating people about the rules of netiquette, "mate". Also, I'm pretty chill. I wasn't SHOUTING was I? On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:41 AM, Odeluga, Ken <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > LOL! > > You don't have to read it mate! Chill. There are bigger problems in > this world aren't there? :) > > -----Original Message----- > From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:40 PM > To: Odeluga, Ken > Cc: 313@hyperreal.org > Subject: Re: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) > Mad Mike interview) > > > I disagree. I don't have any interest in reading about podcast laws > and regulations. The original post was about a specific detroit > related thing that I wanted to keep track of for later, but now i have > to read a new email that has nothing to do with the op every time > somebody replies. A subject change would easily fix this, and it's > just good netiquette. > > On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 7:35 AM, Odeluga, Ken > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> No big deal really - it's still related to the event, which was in >> itself pretty unusual, as the post below points out. >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Frank Glazer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> Sent: Tuesday, September 09, 2008 12:32 PM >> To: 313@hyperreal.org >> Subject: (313) new zealand's podcast laws (was Re: Fw: Re: (313) Mad >> Mike interview) >> >> >> people on this list need to learn how to change the subject lines >> accordingly when the original intent of the post is lost. >> >> On Tue, Sep 9, 2008 at 4:55 AM, pauley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> BBC do exactly the same thing for podcasts of previously recorded >>> radio shows. A podcast is a download, not listened to live, it's not >>> a >> >>> performance licence that's required by Radio NZ. UR needs to be able >>> to collect for the use of their material from the listener, from the >>> downloader. And as RNZ aren't in the business of selling music, and >>> UR >> >>> aren't giving it away, all they can do is make available for >>> downlaod > >>> the material that they own the copyright to, which is the chat, not >>> the music. I think it's it's amazing he was interviewed at all by >>> the > >>> state broadcaster...I can't see BBC1 giving him 30 minutes during >>> any > >>> given day. >>> >>> essentially it's the listener who needs to > This proves once again >>> how NZ takes America's most trumped-up >>>> regulations and makes them worse. >>>> >>>> I know there are geeks in the house who will enjoy Peter Gutmann's >>>> classic story about NZ regulation in the 1990s of "digital >>>> munitions," otherwise known as cryptographic keys, or, "my life as >>>> a > >>>> Kiwi arms courier." >>>> >>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/courier.html >>>> http://www.cs.auckland.ac.nz/~pgut001/policy/wass99.html >>>> >>>> fh >>>> >>>> >>>> ------ mail forwarded, original message follows ------ >>>> >>>> To: 313@hyperreal.org >>>> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <Andy Mitchell> >>>> Subject: Re: (313) Mad Mike interview >>>> Date: Tue, 9 Sep 2008 10:20:16 +1200 (NZST) >>>> >>>>>> They won't let you waiver - music is music to mcps/prs etc and >>>>>> they >> >>>>>> do close people down for it. >>>>> >>>>> This is a New Zealand site remember, so it's controlled by local >>>>> organisation RIANZ not any American organisation. I'm guessing >>>>> their >> >>>>> fees are equally prohibitive though, because *no-one* offers >>>>> podcasts or even streaming archived shows here unless they consist >>>>> purely of talk. >>>> >>>> So I did some snooping and the local situation is this (turned out >>>> it >> >>>> was an organisation called Phonographic Performances New Zealand >>>> who > >>>> control broadcast licenses here): >>>> >>>>> PPNZ does not have an existing assignment to blanket licence >>>>> podcasts at the present time. Any broadcaster seeking to make >>>>> available music on demand is required to seek the permission of >>>>> the > >>>>> individual copyright owners concerned. >>>> >>>> So it's more or less impossible to archive music radio online from >>>> here!Madness... >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> peace, >> >> frank >> >> dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com >> > > > > -- > peace, > > frank > > dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com > -- peace, frank dj mix archive: http://www.deejaycountzero.com
