its pretty simple. A death occurred as a result of the commission of the
crime. had the crime not been committed, the specific death would never
have occurred.  I like motivators not to do crime

On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 10:34 AM Adam Moffett <dmmoff...@gmail.com> wrote:

> The only way I could understand that is if one burglar coerced the other
> into the dangerous situation.  Otherwise I feel like they are each
> responsible for their own actions.   I don't understand how our courts
> could justify this policy.
>
>
> On 5/11/2020 11:15 AM, Jay Weekley wrote:
> > Yep. In a lot of states if your criminal accomplice is killed in the
> > commission of a crime the surviving criminal can be charged with murder.
> >
> > Adam Moffett wrote:
> >> So one burglar is charged with murdering the second burglar who was
> >> shot by the homeowner?  Am I following that correctly?
> >>
> >> That doesn't seem logical.
> >>
> >>
> >> On 5/11/2020 10:53 AM, Steve Jones wrote:
> >>> Im going to go out on a limb and say these plants probably do not
> >>> use E Verify.  We have a case going where two kids broke in to rob a
> >>> house, homeowner shot and killed one of them, the one that didnt die
> >>> is charged with murder because a death occurred during the
> >>> commission of a crime. So say these plant are committing the crime
> >>> of hiring undocumented, and a death occurred, then maybe the company
> >>> leadership could be held criminally liable. would be interesting to see
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, May 11, 2020 at 9:39 AM Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com
> >>> <mailto:af...@kwisp.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>     Some people have suggested the spread at meat packing plants
> >>>     (which are disinfected daily in the normal course of business) may
> >>>     actually be occurring outside the plants, due to things like
> >>>     communal housing.  This is a claim rife with social, economic and
> >>>     racial prejudice.  Yet I think it has merit.  Which probably means
> >>>     I’m prejudiced.
> >>>
> >>>     I would like to think the companies are implementing major changes
> >>>     in changing areas, bathrooms, lunchrooms, entrances and exits,
> >>>     etc, not just distancing on the production lines.  But I would
> >>>     also like to hear that the companies or towns or states or
> >>>     somebody is setting up places for infected workers to isolate
> >>>     rather than just go home and infect their families and neighbors.
> >>>     Or maybe setup some kind of temporary housing to cut the spread
> >>>     outside the plants.
> >>>
> >>>     *From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
> >>>     <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *James Howard
> >>>     *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2020 9:08 AM
> >>>     *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com
> >>>     <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> >>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] COVID liability
> >>>
> >>>     In case people didn’t read the article, Benjamin is the fellow who
> >>>     died.  He was the union Chief Steward…….
> >>>
> >>>     Another point that occurred to me is that everybody just seems to
> >>>     assume that he contracted COVID at work.  What if he got it
> >>>     somewhere else and he was the one that brought it to that plant
> >>>     and spread it?
> >>>
> >>>     *From:*AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Mark
> >>>     Radabaugh
> >>>     *Sent:* Monday, May 11, 2020 6:34 AM
> >>>     *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
> >>>     <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> >>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] COVID liability
> >>>
> >>>     Seems like they employees should be suing the union, after all
> >>>     that was who they were paying dues to to protect them in the
> >>>     workplace.   Apparentl the union did a pretty crappy job.
> >>>
> >>>     Mark
> >>>
> >>>         On May 10, 2020, at 11:17 PM, James Howard <ja...@litewire.net
> >>>         <mailto:ja...@litewire.net>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>         Benjamin was Chief Steward of Local 1776, a chapter of the
> >>>         United Food and Commercial Workers Union.
> >>>
> >>>         *From:*AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken
> >>>         Hohhof
> >>>         *Sent:* Sunday, May 10, 2020 10:05 PM
> >>>         *To:* 'AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group' <af@af.afmug.com
> >>>         <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> >>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] COVID liability
> >>>
> >>>         A 70 year old was working at a slaughterhouse?
> >>>
> >>>         *From:*AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com
> >>>         <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>> *On Behalf Of *Matt Hoppes
> >>>         *Sent:* Sunday, May 10, 2020 9:50 PM
> >>>         *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com
> >>>         <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>
> >>>         *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] COVID liability
> >>>
> >>>         And so it begins.
> >>>
> >>>
> https://www.foxbusiness.com/money/coronavirus-jbs-meat-plant-pennsylvania-death-lawsuit
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>             On May 10, 2020, at 10:43 PM, Chuck McCown
> >>>             <ch...@wbmfg.com <mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>             Only for ugly people.
> >>>
> >>>             Sent from my iPhone
> >>>
> >>>                 On May 10, 2020, at 7:59 PM, James Howard
> >>>                 <ja...@litewire.net <mailto:ja...@litewire.net>>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>                 
> >>>
> >>>                 There are 2 separate issues. Having the government
> >>>                 tell everyone they must wear a mask is one thing.  A
> >>>                 business requiring customers wear a mask to enter
> >>>                 their store is another.  The second actually
> >>>                 correlates to your example and is certainly the right
> >>>                 of any business to put certain requirements on using
> >>>                 their facility (within lawful limits of course).  If
> >>>                 people don’t want to abide by their requirements, they
> >>>                 are free to go somewhere else or stay home if no one
> >>>                 will let them in their place of business.
> >>>
> >>>                 On the other hand, I assume that it will eventually
> >>>                 come before the Supreme Court to decide if it is a
> >>>                 violation of some “right” or other to be told that
> >>>                 everyone is required to wear a mask in public.
> >>>
> >>>                 *From:*AF [mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com] *On Behalf
> >>>                 Of *Matt Hoppes
> >>>                 *Sent:* Sunday, May 10, 2020 1:53 PM
> >>>                 *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group
> >>>                 <af@af.afmug.com <mailto:af@af.afmug.com>>; Steve
> >>>                 Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com
> >>>                 <mailto:thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>>
> >>>                 *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] COVID liability
> >>>
> >>>                 To those saying "why should I have to wear a mask when
> >>>                 in public".... do
> >>>                 you also complain about "No Shirt, No Shoes, No
> >>> Service"?
> >>>
> >>>                 --                 AF mailing list
> >>>                 AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>                 *Total Control Panel*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>                 Login
> >>> <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net>
> >>>
> >>>                 To: ja...@litewire.net
> >>> <
> https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net>
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>                 From: af-boun...@af.afmug.com
> >>>                 <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>                 /You received this message because the domain
> >>>                 afmug.com <http://afmug.com> is on your allow list./
> >>>
> >>>                 --                 AF mailing list
> >>>                 AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>>
> >>>             --             AF mailing list
> >>>             AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         *Total Control Panel*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         Login <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net>
> >>>
> >>>         To: ja...@litewire.net
> >>> <
> https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net>
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         From: af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>         /You received this message because the domain afmug.com
> >>>         <http://afmug.com> is on your allow list./
> >>>
> >>>         --         AF mailing list
> >>>         AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>>         http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>>
> >>>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     *Total Control Panel*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     Login <https://asp.reflexion.net/login?domain=litewire.net>
> >>>
> >>>     To: ja...@litewire.net
> >>> <
> https://asp.reflexion.net/address-properties?aID=242260993&domain=litewire.net>
>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     From: af-boun...@af.afmug.com <mailto:af-boun...@af.afmug.com>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>     /You received this message because the domain afmug.com
> >>>     <http://afmug.com> is on your allow list./
> >>>
> >>>     --     AF mailing list
> >>>     AF@af.afmug.com <mailto:AF@af.afmug.com>
> >>>     http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to