ditto on the metrolinq.  I like the 5GHz backup.  Seems to work fine for
short links as long as you understand it is just a patch antenna on the
font.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:55 PM Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net>
wrote:

> It’s wise of them to have dropped 5GHz because it never really worked all
> that well.
>
> The radios/antennas didn’t seem to be made for it and it ends up causing
> more issues than it solves IMO.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* AF <af-boun...@af.afmug.com> *On Behalf Of * Carl Peterson
> *Sent:* Friday, February 19, 2021 2:50 PM
> *To:* AnimalFarm Microwave Users Group <af@af.afmug.com>
> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Wireless Wire Dish @ 1km
>
>
>
> Seems strange to me that they dropped the 5GHz backup radio from the GBE
> Plus and the AF60LR.  All the other 60GHz radios have a 5GHz backup of some
> sort.
>
> We have installed a number of the little 60GHz GBE radios and they seem
> solid for short links with easy aim.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:31 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> I think they claim their "Wave AI" feature is supposed to somehow
> magically make long links work better... but yeah, being able to use
> 66-70ghz behaves more like 70/80ghz than the lower 60ghz band, so you can
> do much longer distances... you still have the same problem with rain fade,
> but even on something like a 1 mile link that will work at 64-65ghz, it
> works a lot better, since you have more signal to work with.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:11 PM Carl Peterson <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
> wrote:
>
> Is that the only extra magic in the LR?  They claim 12KM vs 2KM.  I would
> never try 12 but I'm tempted to go for up to 3.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021 at 3:02 PM Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> At 1km it won't drop much, but it will still drop occasionally. Ubiquiti
> AF60LR will do a bit better than the other options, because it can use the
> higher channels.
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 19, 2021, 2:16 PM Dev <d...@logicalwebhost.com> wrote:
>
> 700 meter Ignitenet MetroLinq PTP60-35 running around -48dbm during clear
> day says it will do >2.5Gbps with this RSSI, these things do a ton of
> bandwidth. It hangs in there surprisingly well during rain unless it’s
> really DUMPING rain. I think during normal or heavy rain it’s still in the
> mid to high 50’s. Doesn’t seem to use the 5GHz backup much, but traffic
> drops off fast when you do. I have another link doing 1.3km, much worse in
> heavy rain, but very impressive throughput when it’s not raining,
> surprisingly.
>
> > On Feb 19, 2021, at 11:51 AM, Steve Jones <thatoneguyst...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > We havent dealt with 60ghz other than as an outside contractor so ive
> never looked at performance directly. At 1 km what kind of fade are we
> talking in a normal rain shower, and in a downpour?
> > We have had pretty good luck with af24 over the years but need more
> capacity, the fade in 60ghz concerns me, and I never understood the 60 ghz
> ones with 5ghz backup. its like a cruise ship having a backup canoe
> > --
> > AF mailing list
> > AF@af.afmug.com
> > http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carl Peterson
>
> *PORT NETWORKS*
>
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>
> Baltimore, MD 21202
>
> (410) 637-3707
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>
>
>
>
> --
>
> Carl Peterson
>
> *PORT NETWORKS*
>
> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>
> Baltimore, MD 21202
>
> (410) 637-3707
> --
> AF mailing list
> AF@af.afmug.com
> http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com
>


-- 

Carl Peterson

*PORT NETWORKS*

401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553

Baltimore, MD 21202

(410) 637-3707
-- 
AF mailing list
AF@af.afmug.com
http://af.afmug.com/mailman/listinfo/af_af.afmug.com

Reply via email to