I switched out a lot of these from Ubiquiti radios, which is why I had to change the claw. Sorry for the confusion, I did not mean different claw from other cambium products.
On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 9:15 AM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > We’ve been using the regular KP reflector with the 3.65 SM, no special > claw. It fits, unlike the old Motorola 27RD which does not. Am I missing > something about a special claw? I assume you are not talking about the KP > feedhorn which would be used with a connectorized SM. > > > *From:* Kade Sullivan via Af <af@afmug.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:12 AM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities > > Not that I'm aware of, just a different claw at the end, which may or > may not change the focal length. > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> doesnt the kp reflector have a different length arm for the 3.65? >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: >> >>> My advice to customers on how long to wait before calling – 5 minutes >>> is too short, 5 days is too long. >>> >>> And there are the people who call in “my Internet is slow”. How slow? >>> “I’ve been waiting for Google to load for 3 days.” >>> >>> *From:* Matt Jenkins via Af <af@afmug.com> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:54 AM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities >>> >>> <tongue in cheek> >>> Like that customer who's Internet went down last week and they figured >>> it would just automagically come up again without calling in? >>> </tongue in cheek> >>> >>> Matthew Jenkins >>> SmarterBroadbandmatt@sbbinc.net530.272.4000 >>> >>> On 09/23/2014 07:44 AM, Andreas Wiatowski via Af wrote: >>> >>> I do too...I was just hoping it would automagically go away �;.> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Andreas Wiatowski >>> Director / CEO >>> >>> *Silo Wireless Inc.*p: 519 449-5656 <519%20449-5656> / 1-866-727-4138 >>> x600 >>> <*http://silowireless.com/ <http://silowireless.com/>*> � >>> <*http://twitter.com/#!/silowireless >>> <http://twitter.com/#%21/silowireless>*> � >>> <*http://www.facebook.com/silowireless >>> <http://www.facebook.com/silowireless>*> >>> >>> >>> *This email and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL and are >>> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >>> addressed. �If you are not the intended recipient or the person >>> responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised >>> that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, >>> forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.* >>> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >>> *Reply-To: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >>> *Date: *Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0000 >>> *To: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities >>> >>> Is it just me, or do you all see your replies twice? >>> >>> When I post, I see my post, then I see it come through again "via AF" >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af < >>> wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote: >>> >>> All integrated SMs, all with KP Reflectors. >>> >>> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af < >>> wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote: >>> >>> A & B hooked to the same polarity on each client? >>> � >>> � >>> >>> >>> ----- Original Message ----- >>> � >>> *From:* �Kade Sullivan via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com <af@afmug.com>> >>> �� >>> � >>> *To:* wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com >>> � >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:10 �AM >>> � >>> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 �Oddities >>> � >>> >>> � >>> � >>> So I have our second 450 3.65 AP up, and every single �AP at this site >>> is showing a ~10dbi gap between the 2 polarities on the Uplink �side of >>> things (from the SM's perspective). >>> � >>> >>> � >>> The strangest part is that the 10db gap seems to go �back and forth >>> between the A side being the stronger signal and the B �side.� It seems >>> random, and I have included a shot of each of the link �status pages on >>> this AP.� All these SMs are in the same general �geographic area, >>> within 10 degrees of each in relation to the AP. >>> � >>> >>> � >>> You can see the top SM here actually has the A side �with a better >>> signal, while the other 4 show a B side with the higher �signal.� What >>> in the crap is going on here.� Do we have a bad �antenna on the AP? >>> � >>> >>> � >>> I can't seem to make any sense of this at all.� �All these SMs have >>> the same KP reflector, and they have all been visited twice �to ensure >>> they are peaked. >>> � >>> >>> � >>> I'm at a loss here. >>> � >>> >>> � >>> Help me AFMUG! >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the >> parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you >> can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not >> use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >> > >
