<tongue in cheek>
Like that customer who's Internet went down last week and they figured it would just automagically come up again without calling in?
</tongue in cheek>

Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000

On 09/23/2014 07:44 AM, Andreas Wiatowski via Af wrote:
Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities I do too...I was just hoping it would automagically go away ;.>
Cheers,

Andreas Wiatowski
Director / CEO
/Silo Wireless Inc.
/p: 519 449-5656 / 1-866-727-4138 x600
<_http://silowireless.com/_> <_http://twitter.com/#!/silowireless <http://twitter.com/#%21/silowireless>_> <_http://www.facebook.com/silowireless_>

/This email and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL and are intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.
/

------------------------------------------------------------------------
*From: *AFMUG LIST <af@afmug.com>
*Reply-To: *AFMUG LIST <af@afmug.com>
*Date: *Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0000
*To: *AFMUG LIST <af@afmug.com>
*Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities

Is it just me, or do you all see your replies twice?

When I post, I see my post, then I see it come through again "via AF"

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

    All integrated SMs, all with KP Reflectors.

    On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af
    <af@afmug.com> wrote:

        A & B hooked to the same polarity on each client?



            ----- Original Message -----

            *From:*  Kade Sullivan via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com>

            *To:* af@afmug.com

            *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:10  AM

            *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65  Oddities




            So I have our second 450 3.65 AP up, and every single  AP
            at this site is showing a ~10dbi gap between the 2
            polarities on the Uplink  side of things (from the SM's
            perspective).



            The strangest part is that the 10db gap seems to go  back
            and forth between the A side being the stronger signal and
            the B  side.  It seems random, and I have included a shot
            of each of the link  status pages on this AP.  All these
            SMs are in the same general  geographic area, within 10
            degrees of each in relation to the AP.



            You can see the top SM here actually has the A side  with
            a better signal, while the other 4 show a B side with the
            higher  signal.  What in the crap is going on here.  Do we
            have a bad  antenna on the AP?



            I can't seem to make any sense of this at all.   All these
            SMs have the same KP reflector, and they have all been
            visited twice  to ensure they are peaked.



            I'm at a loss here.



            Help me AFMUG!





Reply via email to