Not that I'm aware of, just a different claw at the end, which may or may not change the focal length.
On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > doesnt the kp reflector have a different length arm for the 3.65? > > On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote: > >> My advice to customers on how long to wait before calling – 5 minutes >> is too short, 5 days is too long. >> >> And there are the people who call in “my Internet is slow”. How slow? >> “I’ve been waiting for Google to load for 3 days.” >> >> *From:* Matt Jenkins via Af <af@afmug.com> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:54 AM >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities >> >> <tongue in cheek> >> Like that customer who's Internet went down last week and they figured it >> would just automagically come up again without calling in? >> </tongue in cheek> >> >> Matthew Jenkins >> SmarterBroadbandmatt@sbbinc.net530.272.4000 >> >> On 09/23/2014 07:44 AM, Andreas Wiatowski via Af wrote: >> >> I do too...I was just hoping it would automagically go away �;.> >> Cheers, >> >> Andreas Wiatowski >> Director / CEO >> >> *Silo Wireless Inc.*p: 519 449-5656 / 1-866-727-4138 x600 >> <*http://silowireless.com/ <http://silowireless.com/>*> � >> <*http://twitter.com/#!/silowireless >> <http://twitter.com/#%21/silowireless>*> � >> <*http://www.facebook.com/silowireless >> <http://www.facebook.com/silowireless>*> >> >> >> *This email and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL and are >> intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is >> addressed. �If you are not the intended recipient or the person >> responsible for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised >> that you have received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, >> forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.* >> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >> *Reply-To: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >> *Date: *Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0000 >> *To: *AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities >> >> Is it just me, or do you all see your replies twice? >> >> When I post, I see my post, then I see it come through again "via AF" >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af < >> wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote: >> >> All integrated SMs, all with KP Reflectors. >> >> On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af < >> wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote: >> >> A & B hooked to the same polarity on each client? >> � >> � >> >> >> ----- Original Message ----- >> � >> *From:* �Kade Sullivan via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com <af@afmug.com>> >> �� >> � >> *To:* wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com >> � >> *Sent:* Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:10 �AM >> � >> *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 �Oddities >> � >> >> � >> � >> So I have our second 450 3.65 AP up, and every single �AP at this site >> is showing a ~10dbi gap between the 2 polarities on the Uplink �side of >> things (from the SM's perspective). >> � >> >> � >> The strangest part is that the 10db gap seems to go �back and forth >> between the A side being the stronger signal and the B �side.� It seems >> random, and I have included a shot of each of the link �status pages on >> this AP.� All these SMs are in the same general �geographic area, >> within 10 degrees of each in relation to the AP. >> � >> >> � >> You can see the top SM here actually has the A side �with a better >> signal, while the other 4 show a B side with the higher �signal.� What >> in the crap is going on here.� Do we have a bad �antenna on the AP? >> � >> >> � >> I can't seem to make any sense of this at all.� �All these SMs have >> the same KP reflector, and they have all been visited twice �to ensure >> they are peaked. >> � >> >> � >> I'm at a loss here. >> � >> >> � >> Help me AFMUG! >> >> >> >> >> >> > > > -- > All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the > parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you > can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not > use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925 >
