We have a special holder for the 3.65.  But we have lots of radio holders for 
our reflector now.  The list continues to grow.  

From: Ken Hohhof via Af 
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 8:15 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities

We’ve been using the regular KP reflector with the 3.65 SM, no special claw.  
It fits, unlike the old Motorola 27RD which does not.  Am I missing something 
about a special claw?  I assume you are not talking about the KP feedhorn which 
would be used with a connectorized SM.


From: Kade Sullivan via Af 
Sent: Wednesday, September 24, 2014 9:12 AM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities

Not that I'm aware of, just a different claw at the end, which may or may not 
change the focal length.

On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:45 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

  doesnt the kp reflector have a different length arm for the 3.65?

  On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 12:50 PM, Ken Hohhof via Af <af@afmug.com> wrote:

    My advice to customers on how long to wait before calling – 5 minutes is 
too short, 5 days is too long.

    And there are the people who call in “my Internet is slow”.  How slow?  
“I’ve been waiting for Google to load for 3 days.”

    From: Matt Jenkins via Af 
    Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 11:54 AM
    To: af@afmug.com 
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities

    <tongue in cheek>
    Like that customer who's Internet went down last week and they figured it 
would just automagically come up again without calling in?
    </tongue in cheek>


Matthew Jenkins
SmarterBroadband
m...@sbbinc.net
530.272.4000
On 09/23/2014 07:44 AM, Andreas Wiatowski via Af wrote:

      I do too...I was just hoping it would automagically go away �;.>
      Cheers,

      Andreas Wiatowski
      Director / CEO
      Silo Wireless Inc.
      p: 519 449-5656 / 1-866-727-4138 x600
      <http://silowireless.com/> � <http://twitter.com/#!/silowireless> � 
<http://www.facebook.com/silowireless> 

      This email and any files transmitted with it are CONFIDENTIAL and are 
intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is 
addressed. �If you are not the intended recipient or the person responsible 
for delivering the email to the intended recipient, be advised that you have 
received this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, 
printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.



--------------------------------------------------------------------------
      From: AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com>
      Reply-To: AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com>
      Date: Tue, 23 Sep 2014 14:25:09 +0000
      To: AFMUG LIST <wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com>
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 Oddities

      Is it just me, or do you all see your replies twice?

      When I post, I see my post, then I see it come through again "via AF"

      On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:22 AM, Kade Sullivan via Af 
<wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote:

        All integrated SMs, all with KP Reflectors.

        On Tue, Sep 23, 2014 at 9:20 AM, Glen Waldrop via Af 
<wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com> wrote:

          A & B hooked to the same polarity on each client?
          �
          �


            ----- Original Message ----- 
            �
            From: �Kade Sullivan via Af <mailto:af@afmug.com> ��
            �
            To: wlmailhtml:af@afmug.com 
            �
            Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2014 9:10 �AM
            �
            Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 3.65 �Oddities
            �

            �
            �
            So I have our second 450 3.65 AP up, and every single �AP at this 
site is showing a ~10dbi gap between the 2 polarities on the Uplink �side of 
things (from the SM's perspective).
            �

            �
            The strangest part is that the 10db gap seems to go �back and 
forth between the A side being the stronger signal and the B �side.� It 
seems random, and I have included a shot of each of the link �status pages on 
this AP.� All these SMs are in the same general �geographic area, within 10 
degrees of each in relation to the AP.
            �

            �
            You can see the top SM here actually has the A side �with a 
better signal, while the other 4 show a B side with the higher �signal.� 
What in the crap is going on here.� Do we have a bad �antenna on the AP?
            �

            �
            I can't seem to make any sense of this at all.� �All these SMs 
have the same KP reflector, and they have all been visited twice �to ensure 
they are peaked.
            �

            �
            I'm at a loss here.
            �

            �
            Help me AFMUG!












  -- 

  All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the 
parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't 
get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a 
hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to