Not in my opinion. Having the mast in the center gives it the same stability from all win directions. If a big wind is coming from "behind" this might be more "tippy". Besides, you only need to use one mast.

You can also build almost anything you want out of unistrut.

bp

On 10/30/2014 11:10 AM, That One Guy via Af wrote:
http://sitepro1.com/resources/pdf/assembly-drawings/RTW-7%20(Assembly).pdf <http://sitepro1.com/resources/pdf/assembly-drawings/RTW-7%20%28Assembly%29.pdf>

Would this be a better solution than a single vertical so I have something to affix the strut to?

On Thu, Oct 30, 2014 at 12:06 PM, That One Guy via Af <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

    Our wall mounting option for the 4' antenna is limited to the 25g
    we ran up the side, the antenna will actually be 75 feet up the
    wall from the first platform I dont think unless we installed a
    standing platform we would be able to adjust the antenna.

    I think Im calculating right, its going to take 500lbs ballast if
    I used a PRM4, but the lead time on those exceeds our timeline so
    Im looking at the sitepro tripods.

    We are kind of limited to the non penetrating solution because
    with that we dont have to have a mother may I in place

    A penetrating mount we will, and if a board member says structural
    analysis we are shut down on time.

    So we are limited to horizontal surface mounts

    We can get away with small concrete anchors, but we are talking
    3/8" x 3" and I just dont see that that would be safe. Where would
    I look to find the penetrating mount anchoring requirements, I see
    ballast charts all over, but no anchoring specs.



    On another note, Ive never dealt with 4' antennas before,
    apparently this has a strut. How do I attach a strut if I only
    have the single vertical mast?

    On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 1:00 PM, CARL PETERSON via Af
    <af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

        At the risk of getting my testicals chopped off, I’d recommend
        wall mounting if you can. SBWM-412 from Sitepro is $150 and
        the HWK58 for mounting is ~$30.  Throw in 6’ 0f 4-1/2” pipe
        for $160 and your looking at a solid mount for $340 that takes
        less time to install then it would take to lug the concrete up
        to secure a non-pen with a 4-1/2” pipe on it.  If you need to
        use a non-pen, Id use:
        
http://sitepro1.com/resources/pdf/assembly-drawings/TRPD-HD%20(Assembly).pdf
        
<http://sitepro1.com/resources/pdf/assembly-drawings/TRPD-HD%20%28Assembly%29.pdf>
 with
        a 4-1/2” pipe.
        Carl Peterson
        *PORT NETWORKS*
        401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
        Baltimore, MD 21202
        (410) 637-3707 <tel:%28410%29%20637-3707>

        On Oct 29, 2014, at 8:33 AM, Daniel White via Af <af@afmug.com
        <mailto:af@afmug.com>> wrote:

        That has got to be one of the best e-mails I have read in a
        long time :-)
        Commscope makes a nice option for a large non-pen mast – but
        I’d steer away from anything with less than a 4” OD mast for
        a 4ft antenna.  Rohn makes a similar one, and Baird has a few
        options.
        <image001.jpg>
                
        *Daniel White* | Managing Director
        */SAF North America LLC/**//*
        **
        *Cell:***
                
        (303) 746-3590 <tel:%28303%29%20746-3590>
        *Skype:***
                
        danieldwhite
        *E-mail:***
                
        daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com
        <mailto:daniel.wh...@saftehnika.com>__

        *From:*Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com]*On Behalf Of*That One
        Guy via Af
        *Sent:*Wednesday, October 29, 2014 12:25 AM
        *To:*af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
        *Subject:*[AFMUG] first approved licensed link mounting
        I have two goals, mounting the bastard and grounding the bastard
        If you knew the volume of fecal matter I have had to ea tot
        get this achieved you would understand my very short fuse
        about dealing with dickheads like me that I have.
        I need to first mount this thing. Its likely to be a SAF
        link, and thats that.
        Im going to take a moment to say that regardless of what this
        final project ends up being, if you want one hell of a sales
        guy to work with, Jerrod from Moonblink(Jarrod Washington
        [jarrod.washing...@moonblink.com
        <mailto:jarrod.washing...@moonblink.com>]) is the shit, if
        you badmouth him, I will come to your house, I will castrate
        you, I will fry your man parts in olive oil, give them a
        slight garlic and rosemary seasoning and serve them to you
        over some white rice with a cane vinegar brandy. I float out
        told this guy that after he did all the work, my bosses would
        likely flat out price shop his parts list. He didnt blink and
        kept on doing his thing. If my daughter was old enough, Id
        marry her to him.
        In a perfect world, both sites will be non penetrating
        mounts. One side is 3' the other 4'. The side that wiull have
        the 4' hast the option of being mounted on a set of 25g we
        have running up the wall. The problem is the wall mount is
        currently only secured every 20' with a 2" deep concrete
        anchor, Im pretty sure this wont be sufficient for a 4'
        antenna (currently we only mount 2' parabolics to it)
        We have the option to plow through the wall with plates, but
        if we go to that expenses we might as well go to a full non
        pen for a 4" antenna at the top.
        Any advice on a non pen mount that can support a 4"
        parabolic? This side we can do pretty much whatever, but
        still want the smallest footprint.
        The other side, for non pen, our partner claims to have an 8'
        x 8' footprint mount, the best I ever specced was 10x10 so Im
        suspiscious.
        Both sites are grain elevators. Im looking for the minimum
        grounding to achieve a respectable level of protection. If
        you send me an NEC link, you have no value to me, Im not
        asking because I already know the NEC spec and just want to
        brag about my testicles. I just want a rough Idea of what it
        would take to get to a point where with factory spec
        installation of a Lumina I can meet the minimum ground/bond
        at an elevator and grow from there.

        --
        All parts should go together without forcing. You must
        remember that the parts you are reassembling were
        disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them
        together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not
        use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925




-- All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember
    that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you.
    Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a
    reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance
    manual, 1925




--
All parts should go together without forcing. You must remember that the parts you are reassembling were disassembled by you. Therefore, if you can't get them together again, there must be a reason. By all means, do not use a hammer. -- IBM maintenance manual, 1925

Reply via email to