It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps full duplex (if every packet was a VoIP packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic real-world TCP throughput that you can expect.
On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim <[email protected]> wrote: > It’s really 60! > > > > *60 MHz * > > *CH* > > *N(* > > *G(* > > 1 > > 5960.0250 > > 6212.0650 > > 2 > > 6019.3250 > > 6271.3650 > > 3 > > 6078.6250 > > 6330.6650 > > 4 > > 6137.9250 > > 6389.9650 > > > > As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all depends on the environment. If > x-pol is needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going to be available on the > orthogonal polarization. > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? > > > > In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30 contiguous? > > > > I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC on the same 30 MHz channel than > to find 60 MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t done anything in 6 GHz, > mainly because of antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the antenna rules to > allow down to a 3 ft dish, but realistically that won’t give you enough > gain unless it’s a short link, especially given that 6 GHz is subject to > multipath fades. So bottom line I haven’t kept up with what you can do in > 6 GHz, so I could easily be wrong or behind the times. > > > > *From:* Mike Hammett <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? > > > > 30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6 GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 > GHz... IIRC. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions > http://www.ics-il.com > > > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? > > I would first talk to your frequency coordinator about what FCC channel > widths can be licensed in what bands. I’m not sure 40 MHz channels exist > in 6 GHz, and I believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel width means you need > to license 2 adjacent channels. There is no benefit to having a radio that > does 80 MHz channels if that’s not what you license, other than maybe > having consistent equipment across your network to simplify sparing. > > > > > > *From:* TJ Trout <[email protected]> > > *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM > > *To:* [email protected] > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? > > > > 11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it does in april it's just 60mhz! > Should I even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems like 80 is the way to go? > > > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini <[email protected]> > wrote: > > 11 ghz integra > > > > > > > > Gino A. Villarini > > President > > Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. > > www.aeronetpr.com > > @aeronetpr > > > > > > > > *From: *TJ Trout <[email protected]> > *Reply-To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Date: *Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM > *To: *"[email protected]" <[email protected]> > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? > > > > I guess what I'm interested in is what is the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz > radio in terms of bits/hz or should I just use the lumina in 2+0? > > On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout" <[email protected]> wrote: > > So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I need to upgrade, what is the most > economical option for more capacity ? Saf doesn't really have much besides > 2+0 right now (maybe that's my best option?) So I was thinking about trying > another brand something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What are my options > that won't cost an arm and a leg ? > > > > >
