That sounds backwards. Why would smaller packets net you greater throughput?
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: > It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps full duplex (if every packet > was a VoIP packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic real-world TCP > throughput that you can expect. > > On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> wrote: > >> It’s really 60! >> >> >> >> *60 MHz * >> >> *CH* >> >> *N(* >> >> *G(* >> >> 1 >> >> 5960.0250 >> >> 6212.0650 >> >> 2 >> >> 6019.3250 >> >> 6271.3650 >> >> 3 >> >> 6078.6250 >> >> 6330.6650 >> >> 4 >> >> 6137.9250 >> >> 6389.9650 >> >> >> >> As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all depends on the environment. >> If x-pol is needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going to be available on >> the orthogonal polarization. >> >> >> >> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Ken Hohhof >> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >> >> >> >> In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30 contiguous? >> >> >> >> I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC on the same 30 MHz channel >> than to find 60 MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t done anything in 6 >> GHz, mainly because of antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the antenna >> rules to allow down to a 3 ft dish, but realistically that won’t give you >> enough gain unless it’s a short link, especially given that 6 GHz is >> subject to multipath fades. So bottom line I haven’t kept up with what you >> can do in 6 GHz, so I could easily be wrong or behind the times. >> >> >> >> *From:* Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> >> >> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >> >> >> >> 30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6 GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 >> GHz... IIRC. >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions >> http://www.ics-il.com >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> *From: *"Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >> >> I would first talk to your frequency coordinator about what FCC channel >> widths can be licensed in what bands. I’m not sure 40 MHz channels exist >> in 6 GHz, and I believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel width means you need >> to license 2 adjacent channels. There is no benefit to having a radio that >> does 80 MHz channels if that’s not what you license, other than maybe >> having consistent equipment across your network to simplify sparing. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From:* TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> >> >> *Sent:* Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM >> >> *To:* af@afmug.com >> >> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >> >> >> >> 11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it does in april it's just 60mhz! >> Should I even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems like 80 is the way to go? >> >> >> >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> >> wrote: >> >> 11 ghz integra >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Gino A. Villarini >> >> President >> >> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >> >> www.aeronetpr.com >> >> @aeronetpr >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> >> *Reply-To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> *Date: *Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM >> *To: *"af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >> >> >> >> I guess what I'm interested in is what is the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz >> radio in terms of bits/hz or should I just use the lumina in 2+0? >> >> On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >> >> So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I need to upgrade, what is the >> most economical option for more capacity ? Saf doesn't really have much >> besides 2+0 right now (maybe that's my best option?) So I was thinking >> about trying another brand something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What are >> my options that won't cost an arm and a leg ? >> >> >> >> >> > >
