compression yields a lot at 64byte packet, but yields much less at 256byte and larger...it's a curve.
Also if your upgrading a long 5GHz link with 6Ghz, you'll probably be slightly better off even if the calcs say 'low uptime'. 11GHz will 'swing' during rains more than 6GHz obviously so the higher gain from the same size dishes helps there. Licensing a wide single polarity is always cheapest... -Jon Sent from my iPhone > On Jan 16, 2015, at 3:13 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: > > That sounds backwards. Why would smaller packets net you greater throughput? > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > >> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 3:10 PM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote: >> It's really 60. Ours does 1.4Gbps, 700Mbps full duplex (if every packet was >> a VoIP packet)...500Mbps FDX is a more realistic real-world TCP throughput >> that you can expect. >> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 1:07 PM, Hardy, Tim <tha...@comsearch.com> wrote: >>> It’s really 60! >>> >>> >>> >>> 60 MHz >>> >>> CH >>> >>> N( >>> >>> G( >>> >>> 1 >>> >>> 5960.0250 >>> >>> 6212.0650 >>> >>> 2 >>> >>> 6019.3250 >>> >>> 6271.3650 >>> >>> 3 >>> >>> 6078.6250 >>> >>> 6330.6650 >>> >>> 4 >>> >>> 6137.9250 >>> >>> 6389.9650 >>> >>> >>> >>> As far as XPIC on 30 MHz vs. 60 MHz it all depends on the environment. If >>> x-pol is needed to clear a channel, it isn’t going to be available on the >>> orthogonal polarization. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Ken Hohhof >>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 2:59 PM >>> >>> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >>> >>> >>> In 6 GHz, is 60 really 60, or is it 30+30 contiguous? >>> >>> >>> >>> I’m thinking it might be easier to do XPIC on the same 30 MHz channel than >>> to find 60 MHz of available spectrum, but I haven’t done anything in 6 GHz, >>> mainly because of antenna size. Yes the FCC did relax the antenna rules to >>> allow down to a 3 ft dish, but realistically that won’t give you enough >>> gain unless it’s a short link, especially given that 6 GHz is subject to >>> multipath fades. So bottom line I haven’t kept up with what you can do in >>> 6 GHz, so I could easily be wrong or behind the times. >>> >>> >>> >>> From: Mike Hammett >>> >>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:24 PM >>> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >>> >>> >>> >>> 30 MHz in the 7 GHz band, 30 MHz in some 6 GHz, 60 MHz in the rest of 6 >>> GHz... IIRC. >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions >>> http://www.ics-il.com >>> >>> >>> >>> From: "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:18:19 PM >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >>> >>> I would first talk to your frequency coordinator about what FCC channel >>> widths can be licensed in what bands. I’m not sure 40 MHz channels exist >>> in 6 GHz, and I believe you’ll find an 80 MHz channel width means you need >>> to license 2 adjacent channels. There is no benefit to having a radio that >>> does 80 MHz channels if that’s not what you license, other than maybe >>> having consistent equipment across your network to simplify sparing. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: TJ Trout >>> >>> Sent: Friday, January 16, 2015 1:05 PM >>> >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >>> >>> >>> >>> 11ghz integra doesn't exist, and when it does in april it's just 60mhz! >>> Should I even be considering a 60mhz radio? Seems like 80 is the way to go? >>> >>> >>> >>> On Fri, Jan 16, 2015 at 11:02 AM, Gino Villarini <g...@aeronetpr.com> wrote: >>> >>> 11 ghz integra >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> Gino A. Villarini >>> >>> President >>> >>> Aeronet Wireless Broadband Corp. >>> >>> www.aeronetpr.com >>> >>> @aeronetpr >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> From: TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> >>> Reply-To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>> Date: Friday, January 16, 2015 at 2:57 PM >>> To: "af@afmug.com" <af@afmug.com> >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] 6 or 11ghz best option for higher capacity ? >>> >>> >>> >>> I guess what I'm interested in is what is the cheapest 6 or 11ghz 80mhz >>> radio in terms of bits/hz or should I just use the lumina in 2+0? >>> >>> On Jan 16, 2015 10:54 AM, "TJ Trout" <t...@voltbb.com> wrote: >>> >>> So I have a lumina on 11ghz 56mhz that I need to upgrade, what is the most >>> economical option for more capacity ? Saf doesn't really have much besides >>> 2+0 right now (maybe that's my best option?) So I was thinking about >>> trying another brand something with maybe 80mhz channels ? What are my >>> options that won't cost an arm and a leg ? >>> >
