But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do ePTP? PTP being possibly better if you have a large scale of synced backhauls I suppose.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: > Hi Matt, > > ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame. > > PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The 2.5 msec frame also > will support GPS Sync. > > Dan Sullivan > ePMP Software Manager > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt > Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode > > > Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of operation - > > > > You will see lower latency in most deployments as compared to the TDD & > Flex mode of operation. However, in high interference coupled with long > distance environments the flexible mode will do better in terms of tput. > > At this time, this is per design but we will be addressing and > incorporating some of the good stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of operation > into the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions. > > Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms frame to reduce latency > in the PMP mode of operation. > > > > Thanks > > Sakid > > Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do it WITH GPS sync to > allow frequency reuse for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum. >
