The only reason to use it right now is because of the GigE interface and
802.3af power ability.
So come on Cambium, don't make me buy AirFiber 5X's.
On 3/11/2015 7:19 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
Yes! If the force110 PTP will get a PTP-only sync ability at some
point, I'm going to start using them everywhere even if I don't
actually sync. as they are now, I'm not sure it's worth spending the
extra money over just using a standard force110.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting)
<geo...@cbcast.com <mailto:geo...@cbcast.com>> wrote:
Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the
Sync radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I
can understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the
price and someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP
links, I would spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need
the sync or not, may need it in the future, so why not put it up
now. And I'm talking both ends, you never know if you have to swap
masters for timing.
On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote:
I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it
limited to being only a PTP, just allow the sync.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard
<mhoward...@gmail.com <mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com>> wrote:
There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce
PTP110, is that something that is going to happen? with
the 2.5ms frame, we should get latency closer to what
flexible mode does, correct?
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman
<j...@imaginenetworksllc.com
<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote:
But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do
ePTP? PTP being possibly better if you have a large
scale of synced backhauls I suppose.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan
<daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com
<mailto:daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com>> wrote:
Hi Matt,
ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no
fixed frame.
PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync.
The 2.5 msec frame also will support GPS Sync.
Dan Sullivan
ePMP Software Manager
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Matt
Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM
To: af@afmug.com <mailto:af@afmug.com>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode
> Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of
operation -
>
> You will see lower latency in most deployments
as compared to the TDD & Flex mode of operation.
However, in high interference coupled with long
distance environments the flexible mode will do
better in terms of tput.
> At this time, this is per design but we will be
addressing and incorporating some of the good
stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of operation into
the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the
above conditions.
> Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms
frame to reduce latency in the PMP mode of operation.
>
> Thanks
> Sakid
Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way
to do it WITH GPS sync to allow frequency reuse
for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum.
