Yes! If the force110 PTP will get a PTP-only sync ability at some point, I'm going to start using them everywhere even if I don't actually sync. as they are now, I'm not sure it's worth spending the extra money over just using a standard force110.
On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:58 PM, George Skorup (Cyber Broadcasting) < geo...@cbcast.com> wrote: > Yeah, if I'm going to buy the 110PTP radio, which we know is the Sync > radio with it disabled!, then let me do PTP-only WITH sync. I can > understand they don't want us buying the PTP radio at half the price and > someone figuring out how to hack it into an AP. For PTP links, I would > spend the extra $ for the PTP radio whether I need the sync or not, may > need it in the future, so why not put it up now. And I'm talking both ends, > you never know if you have to swap masters for timing. > > On 3/11/2015 5:13 PM, Mathew Howard wrote: > > I know... I was told they were looking into doing just that. > > On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:30 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com > > wrote: > >> It's software limited to not do sync. I'd like to see it limited to >> being only a PTP, just allow the sync. >> >> >> Josh Luthman >> Office: 937-552-2340 >> Direct: 937-552-2343 >> 1100 Wayne St >> Suite 1337 >> Troy, OH 45373 >> >> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 5:17 PM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> There was some talk of enabling GPS sync on the eForce PTP110, is that >>> something that is going to happen? with the 2.5ms frame, we should get >>> latency closer to what flexible mode does, correct? >>> >>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 3:55 PM, Josh Luthman < >>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote: >>> >>>> But the force110ptp can't sync so it should always do ePTP? PTP being >>>> possibly better if you have a large scale of synced backhauls I suppose. >>>> >>>> >>>> Josh Luthman >>>> Office: 937-552-2340 >>>> Direct: 937-552-2343 >>>> 1100 Wayne St >>>> Suite 1337 >>>> Troy, OH 45373 >>>> >>>> On Wed, Mar 11, 2015 at 4:52 PM, Dan Sullivan < >>>> daniel.sulli...@cambiumnetworks.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi Matt, >>>>> >>>>> ePTP does not support GPS sync as there is no fixed frame. >>>>> >>>>> PTP mode is TDD based and does support GPS Sync. The 2.5 msec frame >>>>> also will support GPS Sync. >>>>> >>>>> Dan Sullivan >>>>> ePMP Software Manager >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Matt >>>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 11, 2015 3:17 PM >>>>> To: af@afmug.com >>>>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] A note on ePMP 2.4 PTP mode >>>>> >>>>> > Just a quick note on the enhanced PTP mode of operation - >>>>> > >>>>> > You will see lower latency in most deployments as compared to the >>>>> TDD & Flex mode of operation. However, in high interference coupled with >>>>> long distance environments the flexible mode will do better in terms of >>>>> tput. >>>>> > At this time, this is per design but we will be addressing and >>>>> incorporating some of the good stuff from our TDD/Flex mode of operation >>>>> into the enhanced PTP to bring back the tput in the above conditions. >>>>> > Please note that we are also working on a 2.5ms frame to reduce >>>>> latency in the PMP mode of operation. >>>>> > >>>>> > Thanks >>>>> > Sakid >>>>> >>>>> Looking at ePMP in 5ghz for PTP. Is there a way to do it WITH GPS >>>>> sync to allow frequency reuse for PTP yet? Running out of 5ghz spectrum. >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >> > >
