Sometime...but ITelite has panels now so...

Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 13, 2015 9:19 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]> wrote:

> I'm holding my breath for the 2.4 connectorized dish Cambium is releasing.
> Isn't that this month?
>
> Josh Luthman wrote:
>
>>
>> Remote is coming.
>>
>> Are you doing epmp on both bands on the dual band itelite?  Have you
>> checked signal to make sure 2g carries farther than 5g?
>>
>> Josh Luthman
>> Office: 937-552-2340u
>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>> 1100 Wayne St
>> Suite 1337
>> Troy, OH 45373
>>
>> On Mar 13, 2015 9:11 PM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected] <mailto:
>> [email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     We have mostly been using the Cambium sectors, but just started
>>     using the ITElite model that does both 2.4 and 5 Ghz on same
>>     sector.  A/B comparison was pretty much identical compared to
>>     Cambium on the 2.4 Ghz side and slightly stronger on the 5 Ghz side.
>>
>>     eDetect has its shortcomings.   It only picks up 801.11 devices on
>>     same frequency.    ePMP doesn’t have remote spectrum analyzer
>>     which would be helpful.   (unless it was just added)
>>
>>     *From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
>>     *Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 9:04 PM
>>     *To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP?
>>
>>     Are you using the suggested sectors, Paul?
>>
>>     Should eDetect see TDD and wifi devices?
>>
>>     Josh Luthman
>>     Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
>>     Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
>>     1100 Wayne St
>>     Suite 1337
>>     Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>     On Mar 13, 2015 8:45 PM, "Paul McCall" <[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
>>
>>     We have about 250 2.4 SMs deployed with pretty good success.
>>  Where we have had some issues are...
>>
>>     1) direct competitor interference in the band.  It does "OK" but
>>     FSK seemed  to do much better at it, but probably because of the
>>     lesser SNR requirements as much as the modulation.  One tower out
>>     of 10 has this issue for us.
>>     2) highly concentrated neighborhoods where the neighbors house
>>     with his wiz-bang overkill home router causes gried.
>>
>>     TIPS:
>>     1) Use Mikrotik routers EVERYWHERE, EVERY customer... to control
>>     the 2.4 "local" environment as much as possible, scan for problems
>>     etc.
>>     2) Be conscious about what Frequency boxes are checked in the
>>     SMs.  Obviously avoid the frequency you have the router at.
>>             If you don't have a second AP that has a good enough
>>     signal (-65 or less) and the customer is NOT on the edge of a
>>     sector, you can keep the second frequency checked
>>             If you have a poor "second AP" signal OR you have a
>>     customer installed on a sector edge, check ONLY the one frequency
>>     of the "good" (proper angled) AP
>>
>>     Doing this, your eDedects will be happy, and you give yourself the
>>     best chance for success.  We actually are writing some SNMP
>>     backend stuff to help point out problems in all these areas, and
>>     proactively "fix" them
>>
>>     Paul
>>
>>     -----Original Message-----
>>     From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
>>     <mailto:[email protected]>] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
>>     Broadcasting)
>>     Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:29 PM
>>     To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
>>     Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP?
>>
>>     Haven't even bought any. We're thinking about not even buying any more
>>     2.4 450. It's just too noisy. All the wifi in neighborhoods,
>>     customer's router interfering with the SM, etc. It's pretty much
>>     as horrible as 900 these days.
>>
>>     And if we don't get to keep 5.7 ISM.. things are gonna get shitty.
>>     3GHz is the only place to go, so we're gonna be doing a bunch more
>>     of it this year.
>>
>>     On 3/13/2015 6:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
>>     > I've heard of several networks having problems with it for one
>>     reason
>>     > or another, generally the inability to coexist with FSK.  Does
>>     any one
>>     > network have some success with them?
>>     >
>>     > Josh Luthman
>>     > Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
>>     > Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
>>     > 1100 Wayne St
>>     > Suite 1337
>>     > Troy, OH 45373
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to