Do you know what the improvement over a bare sm? 16 to 18 db? Cambium
says their dish will do 25 db over a bare sm. Would you trust that number?
Josh Luthman wrote:
16 or 18?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 13, 2015 9:56 PM, "Jay Weekley" <[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
What is the gain on those panels?
Josh Luthman wrote:
Sometime...but ITelite has panels now so...
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 13, 2015 9:19 PM, "Jay Weekley"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>> wrote:
I'm holding my breath for the 2.4 connectorized dish
Cambium is
releasing. Isn't that this month?
Josh Luthman wrote:
Remote is coming.
Are you doing epmp on both bands on the dual band itelite?
Have you checked signal to make sure 2g carries
farther than 5g?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340u
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 13, 2015 9:11 PM, "Paul McCall"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>>
wrote:
We have mostly been using the Cambium sectors, but
just
started
using the ITElite model that does both 2.4 and 5
Ghz on same
sector. A/B comparison was pretty much identical
compared to
Cambium on the 2.4 Ghz side and slightly stronger
on the 5
Ghz side.
eDetect has its shortcomings. It only picks up
801.11
devices on
same frequency. ePMP doesn’t have remote
spectrum analyzer
which would be helpful. (unless it was just added)
*From:*Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman
*Sent:* Friday, March 13, 2015 9:04 PM
*To:* [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
*Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP?
Are you using the suggested sectors, Paul?
Should eDetect see TDD and wifi devices?
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
<tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>> <tel:937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>
<tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>>>
Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>> <tel:937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>>>
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Mar 13, 2015 8:45 PM, "Paul McCall"
<[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>> wrote:
We have about 250 2.4 SMs deployed with pretty good
success. Where we have had some issues are...
1) direct competitor interference in the band. It does
"OK" but
FSK seemed to do much better at it, but probably
because
of the
lesser SNR requirements as much as the
modulation. One
tower out
of 10 has this issue for us.
2) highly concentrated neighborhoods where the
neighbors house
with his wiz-bang overkill home router causes gried.
TIPS:
1) Use Mikrotik routers EVERYWHERE, EVERY
customer... to
control
the 2.4 "local" environment as much as possible,
scan for
problems
etc.
2) Be conscious about what Frequency boxes are
checked in the
SMs. Obviously avoid the frequency you have the
router at.
If you don't have a second AP that has a
good enough
signal (-65 or less) and the customer is NOT on
the edge of a
sector, you can keep the second frequency checked
If you have a poor "second AP" signal OR
you have a
customer installed on a sector edge, check ONLY
the one
frequency
of the "good" (proper angled) AP
Doing this, your eDedects will be happy, and you give
yourself the
best chance for success. We actually are writing
some SNMP
backend stuff to help point out problems in all these
areas, and
proactively "fix" them
Paul
-----Original Message-----
From: Af [mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>>>] On Behalf Of George Skorup (Cyber
Broadcasting)
Sent: Friday, March 13, 2015 8:29 PM
To: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
<mailto:[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>>>
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Any success with 2.4 ePMP?
Haven't even bought any. We're thinking about not even
buying any more
2.4 450. It's just too noisy. All the wifi in
neighborhoods,
customer's router interfering with the SM, etc. It's
pretty much
as horrible as 900 these days.
And if we don't get to keep 5.7 ISM.. things are
gonna get
shitty.
3GHz is the only place to go, so we're gonna be
doing a
bunch more
of it this year.
On 3/13/2015 6:48 PM, Josh Luthman wrote:
> I've heard of several networks having problems
with it
for one
reason
> or another, generally the inability to coexist with
FSK. Does
any one
> network have some success with them?
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>
<tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340>>
<tel:937-552-2340 <tel:937-552-2340> <tel:937-552-2340
<tel:937-552-2340>>>
> Direct: 937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343>>
<tel:937-552-2343 <tel:937-552-2343> <tel:937-552-2343
<tel:937-552-2343>>>
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
