until the distributors get them... don't forget to add at least a few more
days.
On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:55 AM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:
> 6-9 today!!! Hey oh
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:29 AM, Jeremy <jeremysmi...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> In 7-10 days, right??
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 9:28 AM, Josh Luthman <
>> j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I thought it was 24v and a 2amp power supply, so maybe 25 watts? I'll
>>> bust out the amp meter when it finally shows up at my door!
>>>
>>>
>>> Josh Luthman
>>> Office: 937-552-2340
>>> Direct: 937-552-2343
>>> 1100 Wayne St
>>> Suite 1337
>>> Troy, OH 45373
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 11:25 AM, Mathew Howard <mhoward...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> If I remember correctly, ubnt said about 15 watts when they announced
>>>> the AF5x.
>>>>
>>>> On Sat, Mar 21, 2015 at 10:20 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@spitwspots.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have heard 15ish on a netonix port.
>>>>>
>>>>> On March 21, 2015 7:18:58 AM AKDT, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I notice that the AF5X does not have a power consumption value. The
>>>>>> data sheet is no help except that it says the thing uses 24V 1a POE
>>>>>> injector. That implies a maximum of 24 watts. So less than 24 watts.
>>>>>> Anyone have one installed that has measured actual power consumption? If
>>>>>> they're running the POE at 50% duty cycle, that would suggest about 12
>>>>>> watts.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> bp
>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On 3/21/2015 7:11 AM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I did Bill with a little help. I posted it here and ok the UBNT list
>>>>>> awhile back but no one seemed to notice. I intend to keep adding to it
>>>>>> based on input from the community.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:41 PM, "Bill Prince" <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hot damn! Who made that?!?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> bp
>>>>>>> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 3/20/2015 8:13 PM, Ty Featherling wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Oops let's try again. How about this chart...
>>>>>>> ubnt radio comparison
>>>>>>> <https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/10BwvYDqrI4D8nmDRaNtfCeou0j2uZPMGIfXf9GB-cCc/edit?usp=drivesdk>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> -Ty
>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 10:12 PM, "Ty Featherling" <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Try this chart.
>>>>>>>> On Mar 20, 2015 6:07 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, charts are always good. Especially if the chart would
>>>>>>>>> also have checkmarks for which U-NII bands they are currently approved
>>>>>>>>> for. And what power they take.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 5:51 PM
>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Yes, we do have too many variants. It is being streamlined in
>>>>>>>>> the AC line with NanoBeam, Powerbeam (still will have multiple sizes).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam = all integrated
>>>>>>>>> PowerBeam = inner feed/dish design
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> It is a challenge with sku's since may sku's are needed for
>>>>>>>>> different areas of the world (i.e. some products are very popular
>>>>>>>>> here and
>>>>>>>>> not as popular in other parts of the world).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Would chart help?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 4:43 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Ben, you guys have too many product variants, and in some
>>>>>>>>>> cases need better naming. Like NanoBridge, NanoBeam, PowerBeam,
>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam
>>>>>>>>>> AC, PowerBeam AC. I honestly don’t understand the difference
>>>>>>>>>> between a
>>>>>>>>>> NanoBeam and a PowerBeam, or why one has models by antenna gain in
>>>>>>>>>> dB and
>>>>>>>>>> the other by antenna size in mm.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> And of course the NanoStation Loco, why is it Loco? Because it’s
>>>>>>>>>> crazy small?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Then there’s the M vs W thing.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> My head hurts.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> *From:* Ben Moore <ben.mo...@ubnt.com>
>>>>>>>>>> *Sent:* Friday, March 20, 2015 4:13 PM
>>>>>>>>>> *To:* af@afmug.com
>>>>>>>>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] splain the AC ubnt line
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Here you go:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Lite - No airPrism, will do PTP and PTMP
>>>>>>>>>> PTP - PTP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>> PTMP - PTMP only, airPrism
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> These are split due to the filtering used for each (maximize PTP
>>>>>>>>>> and PTMP performance). We won't split unless there is a performance
>>>>>>>>>> reason
>>>>>>>>>> to. The cost is same either way...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> How much is the budget? Consider AF-5X?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 3:02 PM, That One Guy <
>>>>>>>>>> thatoneguyst...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The current iteractions of the rocket AC line, these are the
>>>>>>>>>>> only connectorized units?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> What are the differences between lite, ptp, and ptmp airprism
>>>>>>>>>>> only?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Are some of these shipping without all there guts?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I am looking at replacing an old shitbucket tranzeo link, we
>>>>>>>>>>> already have it connected to one pol of a set of radiowaves 2 foot
>>>>>>>>>>> HP
>>>>>>>>>>> parabolics. I figure its worth checking out these AC radios, but I
>>>>>>>>>>> dont
>>>>>>>>>>> know whats what now, is this a permanent separation with UBNT of
>>>>>>>>>>> ptp and
>>>>>>>>>>> ptmp or is this two things that are going to converge?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Other than the Ac component, for a low throughput demand link is
>>>>>>>>>>> there any major benefit of going to the AC over the M5 in terms of
>>>>>>>>>>> performance? (future demand is a factor as well)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Also considering the epmp, goods, bads uglies between the three
>>>>>>>>>>> products there?
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> If you only see yourself as part of the team but you don't
>>>>>>>>>>> see your team as part of yourself you have already failed as part
>>>>>>>>>>> of the
>>>>>>>>>>> team.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
