LOL! Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On May 26, 2015 9:03 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> wrote:
> You guys are a riot and I know God is laughing. .hell He made the duckbill > platypus...now thats funny. We had on business client install a ptp from > his business to his friends house. They went from 6 users to 15....it > showed up on cpe dhcp list and speeds slowed down. I throttled them to > 1mbps after two calls from us. He called to complain. .then threatened to > cancel. We fired him and shut down LAN port. He called me a few choice > words...oh well...next...I should have asked if I could use his wife for a > few days.... > > Jaime Solorza > On May 26, 2015 6:30 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@spitwspots.com> wrote: > >> Sharing salvation is against the AUP and grounds for termination. >> >> ;) >> >> Josh Reynolds >> CIO, SPITwSPOTSwww.spitwspots.com >> >> On 05/26/2015 04:27 PM, That One Guy /sarcasm wrote: >> >> Their product is eternal salvation. I wonder if we could bundle internet >> with that? >> Speaking of that, what does federal code say about sharing salvation? I >> bet somewhere there's a politician trying to calculate a tax on it. >> On May 26, 2015 4:04 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >> >>> Those missions also develop a skill at knocking on doors and selling >>> an idea or a product. Leading to later in life becoming politicians or >>> starting alarm companies. But I digress. >>> >>> I still remember living in Buenos Aires for 2 years as a kid, and 2 >>> young Mormons knocked on our door. Turns out they didn’t know how to give >>> their speech in English, only Spanish, but they stayed for dinner. >>> >>> >>> *From:* TJ Trout <t...@voltbb.com> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:46 PM >>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Scary Letter >>> >>> They are capitalists first, you can't feed the church on good will... >>> >>> On Tue, May 26, 2015 at 1:29 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote: >>> >>>> But don’t they also vow to help the less fortunate? If they had >>>> more food on the table than they could eat, wouldn’t they share with their >>>> down-on-their-luck relative and neighbors? Well, they have more Internet >>>> than they can use (how much Internet can you use if you don’t watch porn?) >>>> So why waste the excess Internet when others are in need? Does >>>> McDonalds Arctic Circle stop you from taking a doggie bag and giving >>>> your uneaten fries to the homeless? >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 3:19 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Scary Letter >>>> >>>> If you run a coax to the neighbors to use DirecTV or Comcast, they >>>> will call it “theft of service”. Criminal theft of service. Federal code >>>> specifically speaks to this. Just piggybacking on the same idea with the >>>> verbiage. >>>> >>>> TWC says: >>>> It is illegal not only to steal cable services but also to assist >>>> others to steal cable services. In fact, federal law provides for criminal >>>> penalties and civil remedies against people who willfully assist others to >>>> steal cable services. Such assistance can take the form of distributing >>>> "pirate" cable television descrambling equipment, assisting others to make >>>> unauthorized connections to cable systems, promoting the free use of one's >>>> wireless broadband network, or assisting others to hack into their modems >>>> and uncap them. Federal statutes prohibit the assistance of theft of >>>> services offered over a cable system. >>>> >>>> And it appears to be called “theft of service” if it is unwanted: >>>> >>>> http://www.theinternetpatrol.com/man-charged-with-theft-of-services-for-using-free-wifi-at-coffee-shop-in-for-a-brewed-awakening/ >>>> >>>> As far as the LDS folks go, it is not intended to scare them, it is >>>> intended to trigger a guilty conscience. They vow to be honest. This is >>>> intended to remind themthat this is not an honest behavior. >>>> >>>> *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:03 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Scary Letter >>>> >>>> Not for me. I would avoid the whole theft of service approach. I >>>> think you are on shaky legal ground, plus it sounds lame unless LDS folks >>>> really are easily scared. >>>> >>>> Say it is against the Terms of Service they agreed to, and will result >>>> in disconnection of service. That doesn’t mean it is a crime. >>>> >>>> The better approach is probably that unsecured WiFi lets anyone within >>>> range capture everything you transmit without encryption, allows them >>>> access to your network and router on the trusted side of your firewall >>>> making it much easier for hackers, and as you mentioned could cause law >>>> enforcement to blame you for bad things someone else did on the Internet >>>> via your IP address. >>>> >>>> >>>> *From:* Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> >>>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 26, 2015 2:39 PM >>>> *To:* af@afmug.com >>>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] Scary Letter >>>> >>>> Brett, Ken does this wording work better? >>>> >>>> 5) Allowing a neighbor to use your WiFi connection instead of >>>> purchasing service for their own house is a crime called “Theft of >>>> Service”. You are collaborating in this theft and jeopardizing your own >>>> service as well. >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>
