Very little in the SitePro1 catalog that we can’t do, but some of the stuff we 
cannot do at the same price as them.  I would guess we can beat them 75% of the 
time on price.  We just keep adding things as people ask for them.  

From: Lewis Bergman 
Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:14 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT Guerilla Marketing

I guess it is my grey hair but I still like catalogs. SitePro1 (Valmont) send 
me a catalog and I prefer using it but still use their web site some. It would 
be nice to have another source for everything in there.

On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:11 PM, Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> 
wrote:

  IME Gmail would catch it as spam.  All of them mass messages have been caught 
in the last 6 months.  I've gone through my spam box to find them and marked 
them as not spam, but have not seen it change the results. 

  Your target market is here, right?  Why not just a bunch of neat pictures 
with applications.  I'm sure there are some other WISPs that have used your 
products that I have never thought of.  If there is another place for me to use 
an MTOW, I'd have to buy more.



  Josh Luthman
  Office: 937-552-2340
  Direct: 937-552-2343
  1100 Wayne St
  Suite 1337
  Troy, OH 45373

  On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

    I spend some time each day trying to figure out how to get my products 
marketed.
    Have a nice new shiny paper catalog just about done and will be mailing it 
to those interested.

    My question is -----

    Is spam dead?  I have several nice lists of people (all of you included).  
If I sent a brief note to several thousand people saying something like:  

      Dear (Spam Target):

      Thanks for attending Animal Farm.Wispapalloza/ etc etc.  I have a new 
catalog (available here url pdf etc).  

      Would you like to receive a real one in the mail?

      With all my best wishes (over the top complementary closing etc).

      Chuck

    Would that offend?
    Would that get scraped off by gmail etc?
    Is there a better way?





Reply via email to