There is an organization we belong to for our Two Way business named USMSS. Maybe it would be a place to advertise in a targeted way.
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 2:14 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > The core of the target market is here, but I have a bunch of new stuff > that the cell phone companies could use. As well as traffic cams, GPS > antennas etc etc. I have a bunch of new tower steel stuff. > > Just hate to spend postage if spam is still somehow viable. > > *From:* Josh Luthman <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 24, 2015 1:11 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT Guerilla Marketing > > IME Gmail would catch it as spam. All of them mass messages have been > caught in the last 6 months. I've gone through my spam box to find them > and marked them as not spam, but have not seen it change the results. > > Your target market is here, right? Why not just a bunch of neat pictures > with applications. I'm sure there are some other WISPs that have used your > products that I have never thought of. If there is another place for me to > use an MTOW, I'd have to buy more. > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 3:06 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote: > >> I spend some time each day trying to figure out how to get my products >> marketed. >> Have a nice new shiny paper catalog just about done and will be mailing >> it to those interested. >> >> My question is ----- >> >> Is spam dead? I have several nice lists of people (all of you >> included). If I sent a brief note to several thousand people saying >> something like: >> >> >> Dear (Spam Target): >> >> Thanks for attending Animal Farm.Wispapalloza/ etc etc. I have a new >> catalog (available here url pdf etc). >> >> Would you like to receive a real one in the mail? >> >> With all my best wishes (over the top complementary closing etc). >> >> Chuck >> >> >> Would that offend? >> Would that get scraped off by gmail etc? >> Is there a better way? >> >> >> >> >> > >
