I don't know where you are getting your pricing for calix Josh but we are
paying nowhere near what you are stating here.

We buy the gigacenters for $149 and the cloud platform is $150/mo for 500
users.

We charge $99 "setup fee" to our clients and $12/mo. for our "managed wifi"
service.  ROI is ~4months/client.

 So the first 13 clients pay for the cloud platform for the other 487.

Sean


On Friday, January 1, 2016, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> wrote:

> I have a very modest home if you don't count the barn and unfinished
> basement. Around 1860sqrft. 5GHz barely works through one plaster or
> sheetrock wall in my home.
>
> I'm "desiring" a solution where we can have the customer name and account
> number in the admin panel, then drill down and manage their gpon router,
> and the multiple wireless APs on their account. Flow export is okay, but
> procera does a far better job than calix in that regard (data monitoring
> for customer troubleshooting).
>
> Hopefully this comes to fruition without costing us $7+ /sub/month like
> calix does.
> On Jan 1, 2016 5:42 PM, "Ken Hohhof" <af...@kwisp.com
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af...@kwisp.com');>> wrote:
>
>> Interesting they refer to 2.4 GHz as for “legacy devices”.  I suspect
>> that 5 GHz in the large homes of the likely target market will need more
>> than 1 access point to cover the entire house, despite the best MIMO and
>> beamforming technology.  Especially the way some customers resist locating
>> the router at the center of the house because “I don’t want to look at
>> wires”.
>>
>> Really, new houses should be designed and wired with probably 10 gigabit
>> Internet in mind, assuming you won’t want to rip the walls open in 10 or 20
>> years to rewire.  If rooms are designed with places for “network boxes” and
>> fiber or Cat6/7 cable back to a hub point, the electronics can be upgraded
>> as technology evolves.
>>
>>
>> *From:* Chuck McCown <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','ch...@wbmfg.com');>
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 01, 2016 4:50 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>> https://www.calix.com/systems/gigafamily-overview/GigaCenters.html
>>
>> *From:* Sterling Jacobson
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');>
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 01, 2016 3:36 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>>
>> Ok, do you have a link to information then?
>>
>>
>>
>> I’m not familiar with Calix for this particular solution, though I’ve
>> heard of them.
>>
>>
>>
>> Also, I’m lazy J
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] *On Behalf Of *Sean
>> Heskett
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 1, 2016 3:25 PM
>> *To:* af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>>
>>
>> $149
>>
>> On Friday, January 1, 2016, Sterling Jacobson <sterl...@avative.net
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');>> wrote:
>>
>> For $200?
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* Af [mailto:javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');] *On
>> Behalf Of *Sean Heskett
>> *Sent:* Friday, January 1, 2016 2:24 PM
>> *To:* javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');
>> *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>>
>>
>> Calix can do all that and a whole lot more sterling
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> On Friday, January 1, 2016, Sterling Jacobson <
>> javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','sterl...@avative.net');> wrote:
>>
>> I hear you.
>>
>> My new year's goal is to find a better solution for my customers.
>>
>> Unfortunately, at 100-1000Mbps, the pickings are still slim.
>>
>> I would like to use MikroTik and manage the routing, but I'm finding that
>> it's still best to get a really nice $100-$300+ single Wireless AC router
>> and place it in the center of the house.
>>
>> What I would really like is a good split solution with routing in the
>> head/basement, and wireless AC in bridge mode in one or two places in the
>> house.
>>
>> But that doesn't seem to exist.
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af-boun...@afmug.com');>] On Behalf Of Ken
>> Hohhof
>> Sent: Friday, January 1, 2016 10:30 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>> I'm seeing a gradual increase in customers leasing a managed Mikrotik
>> from us, we charge $5/mo for a RB951G-2HnD which has been very trouble free
>> for us once we tweak a couple WiFi parameters.  I think they look at the
>> pile of discarded routers in their closet and decide to let someone else
>> deal with it.  Most still fall into either the "I can buy one at Walmart
>> for $50" camp or the "I like going to Best Buy and letting the sales guy
>> talk me into the
>> $250 router because I like shopping for expensive toys" camp.  And people
>> still look at the humble little white Mikrotik in its plain brown box and
>> think it can't possibly match their big black AC1900 router that looks like
>> a weapon from Star Wars.
>>
>> The question I guess is whether to join the cable/telco crowd and supply
>> the WiFi router and manage it for no additional revenue, and then what to
>> do about the people who still want to put their own Star Wars router behind
>> it.
>>
>> It is very disappointing that since Belkin bought Linksys they are now
>> designing their own Linksys branded routers that are far worse than the
>> Linksys designed E series which certainly had their own problems.  I
>> replaced a customer's Belksys AC1900 router with a Mikrotik this week and
>> they went from having total dead spots in parts of their house on both 2.4
>> and 5 GHz to having full bars and great performance everywhere including
>> the basement.  Their minds were boggled at this little white box with no
>> external antennas blowing away the big black monster.
>>
>> Of the household brands, Netgear doesn't seem all that bad, except their
>> low end WNR2000 has a really high failure rate.  I see people starting to
>> trend toward less known brands like Asus and TP-Link.  But too many of my
>> customers think the electronics store is "Walmart" and they seem to come
>> back with these Belkin pieces of crap, I particularly hate the model that
>> only has 1 LED on the whole router and you have to interpret the color and
>> number of flashes, it's like figuring out what R2D2 is saying.  What's that
>> R2?  No link on port 3?
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Simon Westlake
>> Sent: Friday, January 01, 2016 11:04 AM
>> To: af@afmug.com <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','af@afmug.com');>
>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] OT - bad dream
>>
>> I've honestly given up completely on all residential routers, they seem
>> to be slowly converging on a common denominator which is that none of them
>> work properly and only last a few months. I had to replace my router
>> recently, and just got a Mikrotik instead. One of the guys I work with just
>> replaced his old Linksys with a Mikrotik, and all of his minor problems
>> went away.
>>
>> I used to think that it was a bad idea to provide managed routers to end
>> users, but I'm slowly changing my mind after realizing how many issues are
>> caused by them. There's also a lot you could do to provide better service
>> to an end user, hypothetically.. let's say you put in a DD-WRT or Mikrotik
>> router and setup some shaping on the client side with SFQ.
>> They'd probably see a lot less issues with their Netflix buffering when
>> their Xbox was downloading a game, or their VoIP cutting out when they're
>> watching Daredevil in 4K.
>>
>> On 1/1/2016 10:05 AM, Ken Hohhof wrote:
>> > I had a bad dream where all my customers go to Walmart and buy Belkin
>> > routers.  I tried to wake up but I wasn't dreaming.
>> Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!
>> >
>>
>> --
>> Simon Westlake
>> Skype: Simon_Sonar
>> Email: javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','simon@sonar.software');
>> Phone: (702) 447-1247
>> ---------------------------
>> Sonar Software Inc
>> The next generation of ISP billing and OSS https://sonar.software
>>
>>

Reply via email to