Had nothing to do with the actually vendors, came down to supply and demand on the gray market. On Feb 27, 2016 7:02 PM, "Paul Stewart" <[email protected]> wrote:
> Juniper doesn’t like to lose deals to Brocade ;) > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Josh Reynolds > *Sent:* Saturday, February 27, 2016 2:41 PM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 40G > > > > I almost ended up with 4 MLXe-8's a few months ago, but ended up getting a > killer deal on some MX960s instead. > > On Feb 27, 2016 1:37 PM, "Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > If you go with Brocade, the MLXe is the lowest line that will give you > full MPLS with the number of ports you are requiring 10 or 40 or 100. I > talked to them yesterday about where their line is between CER and MLXe. I > was told possibly early next year, but no specifics. > > > > If you want me to price one or two for you, let me know. We just did a > big order of CERs for Fusion, so we are on their radar :) > > > > Erich Kaiser > > North Central Tower > > [email protected] > > Office: 630-621-4804 > > Cell: 630-777-9291 > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 1:23 PM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > Windstream. I assume it's running on the same DTN-X platform that their > 100G is running on, which should do coherent 40G. > > I know it will depend on what they're using and obviously how proud they > are of it. I'm just here to talk about the switches on the ends and not > what's in the middle. I can't make an informed decision without having both > pieces and in due time I'll have the transport cost piece. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Erich Kaiser" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, February 27, 2016 1:05:18 PM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 40G > > Mike, > > Whos long haul is it? It will depend on what they are using on their > end. The cheapest solution is multi-10g waves. > > > > > Erich Kaiser > > North Central Tower > > [email protected] > > Office: 630-621-4804 > > Cell: 630-777-9291 > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Mike Hammett <[email protected]> wrote: > > It would be getting waves on someone else's long haul network. > > 10G is a slam dunk over 10x 1G. Just checking out the scene for 40G. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > > *From: *"Sterling Jacobson" <[email protected]> > *To: *[email protected] > *Sent: *Saturday, February 27, 2016 11:25:12 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] 40G > > Depends on the distance, is this for WAN over a mile or two? > > > > QSFP+ modules and switches can be cheap, but I agree that long distance > bonding of 4x10 SFP+ modules is cheaper. > > > > > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:[email protected]] *On Behalf Of *Gino Villarini > *Sent:* Saturday, February 27, 2016 10:22 AM > *To:* [email protected]; [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] 40G > > > > i think is more cost effective to bond 4 10g? > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 9:17 AM -0800, "Josh Reynolds" < > [email protected]> wrote: > > Which means that 40Gb WAN kin is now a steal :) > > On Feb 27, 2016 11:05 AM, "Gino Villarini" <[email protected]> wrote: > > 40g is for lan, wan has jumped to 100g > > Sent from Outlook Mobile <https://aka.ms/qtex0l> > > > > > > On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 8:37 AM -0800, "Mike Hammett" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > For those of you that have looked at 40G, what are your thoughts on the > hardware available? I'm looking at primarily switching, though something > that does VPLS, CE or similar features would be nice. Something with TRILL > or a TRILL derivative would be nice too. > > I'm not talking Juniper MX scale. Light on power is one of the biggest > priorities. > > It doesn't need to have a million ports, either. I do like the Nexus 9k > that we've got, but in some areas, something with more functionality would > be nice. > > I'm perfectly aware that what I want feature wise may not be available > cost wise. > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > > > > > > > > > >
