Wasn’t there a post from them saying for a few bucks more there is a better 
mount?


From: Cassidy B. Larson 
Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 6:18 PM
To: af@afmug.com 
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

FWIW on these IgniteNet 60GHz, the mounts are horrendous. We got a couple of 
pairs and my installers are saying they’re worse than a nano bridge mount.. For 
the stability one would need to keep these locked on during a breeze, we were 
expecting a much heavier duty mount.  

Chuck, another product idea for ya :) 

-c

  On Apr 4, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> wrote:

  I thought that was Trump’s plan to eliminate the national debt in 8 years!

  Or a new reality TV show:  Naked and Unshod.


  From: Faisal Imtiaz 
  Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 5:31 PM
  To: af@afmug.com 
  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

  I often tell my wife.... 

  If the women of the world stopped buying shoes and clothes for 3 months, 
there will be a total world wide economic collapse !


  :)

  Faisal Imtiaz
  Snappy Internet & Telecom
  7266 SW 48 Street
  Miami, FL 33155
  Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

  Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    From: "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
    To: "Animal Farm" <af@afmug.com>
    Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:58:01 PM
    Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

    Ha
    On Apr 4, 2016 1:53 PM, "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com> wrote:

      I told my wife this morning that I am going to have to find a rehab 
center for an Amazon addict. 

      From: Jaime Solorza
      Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:47 PM
      To: Animal Farm
      Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

      My wife always complains that I don't need more tools   I respond... when 
you stop buying shoes, I will stop buying tools...she gives me the death stare.
      On Apr 4, 2016 1:44 PM, "Faisal Imtiaz" <fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:

        Chuck, somehow you remind me of my business partner.... who goes 
looking for projects, cause they are a perfect opportunity to collect (buy) 
more tools... one can never have enough tools !

        (He is more into power tools, construction, mechanical etc ...)

        :)

        Faisal Imtiaz
        Snappy Internet & Telecom
        7266 SW 48 Street
        Miami, FL 33155
        Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

        Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net


------------------------------------------------------------------------

          From: "Chuck McCown" <ch...@wbmfg.com>
          To: af@afmug.com
          Sent: Monday, April 4, 2016 3:36:59 PM
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

          I just tested a cable tester from Ideal that qualifies GigE circuits.

          Nice thing is, it will do a data test without cable continuity.
          (It also does the actual cable continuity tests too).

          I wonder what it would show on a less than 1Gbps radio.  $1325

          From: Harold Bledsoe
          Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 1:32 PM
          To: af@afmug.com
          Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

          Sorry to be late to the party.  ;-) 

          I have a few comments on iperf though.  Iperf2 is not very reliable 
at high speeds.  For high speeds, iperf3 tends to do a little better assuming 
you have enough computer to push the required speeds.  However iperf3 cannot 
yet do bi-di tests.

          For affordable testing, we've found Mikrotik's traffic generator to 
be pretty good.  It's a little complicated to setup the first time but then it 
is better.  Beware using btest - it uses a single core and can't keep up 
especially if you try random data.

          Then there's RFC testers like Exfo, Smartbits, etc.  We use Smartbits.

          Thanks,
          -Hal

          On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 9:15 AM Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> 
wrote:

            Every new gear is suspicious in regards of holding up to the 
promises made.

             
            We’ve heard so many promises in the past and very often the truth 
does not meet marketing.

             
            So there is nothing aggressive if someone wants to see iperf 
testing. Seeing is believing.

             

             
            Von: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] Im Auftrag von Ken Hohhof
            Gesendet: Montag, 4. April 2016 15:08
            An: af@afmug.com
            Betreff: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?

             

            By comparison to the presidential contest, the tone was very mild!  
Did you see Jimmy Kimmel’s American Girl & Boy Dolls Presidential Collection?
            https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=FYHPr7TL2AY

             
            From: Faisal Imtiaz 

            Sent: Monday, April 04, 2016 8:03 AM

            To: af@afmug.com 

            Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?


             
            I am not being defensive about Ignite, as I stated in my email.... 
I am having a reaction to the tone of your question. If you were to look at my 
posts you will also see that I have expressed similar feelings to others in 
regards to how they ask the question... irrespective of who they are asking 
about.  I also apologized for this being a personality defect in myself.

             
            The Cut & Paste was not for your benefit, but for others who lurk 
in the forums.

             
            There is nothing wrong with running an iperf test.. but you 
specifically asked for the test to be run in a very particular way, from very 
particular pieces of equipment..... 

             
            My apologies if I am over reacting.... WISP's have many many great 
attributes, however there is one attribute which would be nice to change for 
the better.... Our Attitudes towards the mfg. and the default presumption of a 
'conspiracy' or 'they are trying to pull a fast one on us'..... along with it 
also having enough fortitude to asking the MFG and or their representatives the 
technical questions before coming to the open forums and taking an opinion 
poll....

             
            ok, I will now get off my soap box.

             

             

             
            Regards

             

             
            Faisal Imtiaz
            Snappy Internet & Telecom
            7266 SW 48 Street
            Miami, FL 33155
            Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

            Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net

             

--------------------------------------------------------------------

              From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
              To: af@afmug.com
              Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:52:00 PM
              Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
              For somebody who doesn't own a piece of the company and doesn't 
work there, you're extremely defensive. I don't need a copied and pasted 
explanation of what FDD and TDD are.

              How in any way whatsoever is it inappropriate to run iperf tests 
on a newly released PTP bridge radio?

               
              On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:31 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
<fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:


                like I said before..  ask the question directly... no need for 
the cloak and dagger ...

                 
                -----------
                Frequency-division duplexing (FDD) is a method for establishing 
a full-duplex communications link that uses two different radio frequencies for 
transmitter and receiver operation. The transmit direction and receive 
direction frequencies are separated by a defined frequency offset. In the 
microwave realm, the primary advantages of this approach are:
                -----------------
                NO THEY ARE NOT FDD.

                 
                ------------
                Time-division duplexing (TDD) is a method for emulating 
full-duplex communication over a half-duplex communication link. The 
transmitter and receiver both use the same frequency but transmit and receive 
traffic is switched in time. The primary advantages of this approach as it 
applies to microwave communication are:
                ------------------
                YES They are TDD. ( The notation of 1gig aggregate should have 
give this away ! )

                 
                Like all new products, they are making improvements with 
firmware updates. The published specs are 'conservative'. 

                 
                These are the first radios of their kind in the market place... 
I think you will need to modify your thinking about them, cause you keep 
comparing them to the other existing (much more expensive) radios in the market 
place.

                 
                Anything else you would like to know ? 

                 
                Feel free to ask...... 

                 
                BTW, FWIW, I don't work for Ignite, nor do I own a piece of the 
company (would love to buy stock in them if I could). I am on the beta testers 
of the product... There is something about the tone of your question that is 
rubbing me the wrong way, my apologies if I am over reacting...... I normally  
expect the proper professional decorum to be.. ask the question directly, and 
only if that is not answered or if the answer is not straight forward then it 
is ok to imply some intentional obfuscation.....  not the other way around !

                 
                :)

                 
                Faisal Imtiaz
                Snappy Internet & Telecom
                7266 SW 48 Street
                Miami, FL 33155
                Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

                Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net

                 

----------------------------------------------------------------

                  From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
                  To: af@afmug.com
                  Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 11:14:08 PM
                  Subject: Re: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
                  I'm not trying to prove or disprove anything, just to compare 
them with existing line rate 60 GHz FDD solutions.

                  The datasheet says 1Gbps aggregate throughput but nowhere 
does it say specifically if they're FDD or TDD in the 60 GHz band:

                  
http://www.ignitenet.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/IgniteNet_MetroLinq.pdf




                   
                  On Sun, Apr 3, 2016 at 8:01 PM, Faisal Imtiaz 
<fai...@snappytelecom.net> wrote:
                    What exactly are you looking to prove of dis-prove with 
such a test ?

                     
                    Iperf is iperf, what difference does it make how it is 
run....

                     
                    Are you asking the question 'How much data I can push thru 
with these radios ?'..... the question has been answered multiple times...
                    the radios are (as per specs, 1gig half duplex, thus giving 
you 500meg x 500meg performance.)

                     
                    The Radio side is using 2ghz wide channel, and the latest 
firmware is showing 700meg x 700meg performance....

                     
                    What is the problem with this ? if you think Ignite is 
lying about the specs, buy a pair, do the testing you like, with pink, blue, or 
purple laptop of your choice and if you don't like them, send them back !... or 
someone will be happy to buy them from you ... they are in short supply as it 
is ....

                     
                    :)

                     
                    Regards.

                     
                    Faisal Imtiaz
                    Snappy Internet & Telecom
                    7266 SW 48 Street
                    Miami, FL 33155
                    Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232

                    Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: 
supp...@snappytelecom.net

                     

------------------------------------------------------------

                      From: "Eric Kuhnke" <eric.kuh...@gmail.com>
                      To: af@afmug.com
                      Sent: Sunday, April 3, 2016 10:03:39 PM
                      Subject: [AFMUG] IniteNet 60 GHz radio iperf tests?
                      Anyone done a simultaneous bidirectional iperf test yet?  
Preferably with something like a Thinkpad (Intel 1000BaseT NIC) running Linux 
plugged into each end.

                       

                   

               




Reply via email to