Yea, I need the capacity though. 100Mbps isn’t going to cut it although it may be my only option to start. Field test time.
Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Chuck McCown Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2016 8:02 AM To: af Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration That would be much more solid in the tree situation. From: Mathew Howard<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 11:14 PM To: af<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration It's limited to a 20mhz channel, so I think like 120Mbps aggregate... or something like that. On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 11:01 PM, Chuck McCown <ch...@wbmfg.com<mailto:ch...@wbmfg.com>> wrote: What is the new 900 MHz Cambium supposed to do flat out? From: Mathew Howard<mailto:mhoward...@gmail.com> Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 8:29 PM To: af<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration Indeed, a bit odd... I've never known 5ghz to work better than 2.4ghz nlos :P I would just try it and see what it does... even if you just test it with a pair of PowerBeams (or better yet, Rockets with 2`dishes), you should be able to get a pretty good idea what the airfibers are going to do. On Apr 22, 2016 8:41 PM, "Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com<mailto:j...@kyneticwifi.com>> wrote: Something that takes a larger channel width to make the same throughput (losing sensitivity due to thermal noise in the process) vs an FPGA radio at half the frequency through trees? :P Just seems like an odd tip. On Apr 22, 2016 8:35 PM, "Keefe John" <keefe...@ethoplex.com<mailto:keefe...@ethoplex.com>> wrote: What about a b5? On April 22, 2016 8:32:36 PM CDT, Rory Conaway <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: We would need at least 150Mbps to start but as much as I could get is what I need. I don’t have a bucket truck but I can do a reasonable test up there to get an idea with both 2.4 and 5GHz. Rory From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com<mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com>] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Friday, April 22, 2016 5:53 PM To: af@afmug.com<mailto:af@afmug.com> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] Theoretical Question on Pine Tree Penetration 200 megs in 10 MHz? AF2x????? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 22, 2016 8:48 PM, "Jaime Solorza" <losguyswirel...@gmail.com<mailto:losguyswirel...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hold on..you'd be surprised what 5 and ,,,10mhz channels at 2.4 can penetrate...can you test Rory with some masts or bucket truck? I am make a rig for my truck to mount a 30 ft tower and have a mast to go maybe 15 ft higher... Some projects are requiring path validations on federal property.... So bucket truck at one end and my rig at other... On Apr 22, 2016 6:39 PM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com<mailto:j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>> wrote: Like 0? Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340<tel:937-552-2340> Direct: 937-552-2343<tel:937-552-2343> 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Apr 22, 2016 8:33 PM, "Rory Conaway" <r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net>> wrote: What are the chances of an AF2 with parabolic dishes going through .9 miles of trees with at least 200Mbs assuming no interference? Rory Conaway • Triad Wireless • CEO 4226 S. 37th Street • Phoenix • AZ 85040 602-426-0542<tel:602-426-0542> r...@triadwireless.net<mailto:r...@triadwireless.net> www.triadwireless.net<http://www.triadwireless.net/> “I wish I could play little league now. I’d be way better than before.” -- Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.
