To be technical, it's not going to remove NAT on your network for the foreseeable future unless when you add IPV6 that you also give everybody a public IPV4 as well :P
Maybe a decade from now we'll be able to ditch NAT :( Yes, there are several v6/v4 and v4/v6 translation mechanisms, but those are really just different types of Network Address Translation, regardless of if they are officially called that or not. (Not that you don't know this Mike, I just don't want the nice people following along with the list to get the wrong information about the ipv6 transition.) On May 3, 2016 8:35 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Having NAT problems? Having problems tracking down DMCA or subpoena > targets? It's impacting your functionality. > > Moving to IPv6 will also increase performance due to the removal of NAT. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 8:18:33 AM > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations > > Seth, > > I think it is pick your battles when you can. Some of use run at 100% > capacity in execution, and we have to carve out additional time to do > whatever the "other" things are. And there are a LOT of those "other" > things for growing companies. > > We all know it's important. But, if it is so easy, then when it's time to > hit it head on as it will being impacting our functionality, we can > "easily" take that time, at that time :) > > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen > Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:55 AM > To: af@afmug.com > Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations > > On 5/2/16 11:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: > > Everyone *SHOULD* be caring about IPv6. > > > > Why people running ISPs refuse to or are resistant to learn about things > directly related to the business they claim to be in baffles me. > > ~Seth > >
