Since most of the major websites are now ipv6 enabled (google,youtube, facebook,xhamster, yahoo,wikipedia) you would expect to see about %20 of traffic to be ipv6.
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:46 AM, Ty Featherling <tyfeatherl...@gmail.com> wrote: > Does anyone running a dual-stack network graph their IPv6 internet > traffic? I only have my home traffic to compare to right now but the IPv6 > is a trickle of the IPv4. Until the tipping point happens where enough of > the internet CONTENT has moved to IPv6, then there will not be anything > driving adoption in a real way. > > -Ty > > > > -Ty > > On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 8:41 AM, Josh Reynolds <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > wrote: > >> To be technical, it's not going to remove NAT on your network for the >> foreseeable future unless when you add IPV6 that you also give everybody a >> public IPV4 as well :P >> >> Maybe a decade from now we'll be able to ditch NAT :( >> >> Yes, there are several v6/v4 and v4/v6 translation mechanisms, but those >> are really just different types of Network Address Translation, regardless >> of if they are officially called that or not. >> >> (Not that you don't know this Mike, I just don't want the nice people >> following along with the list to get the wrong information about the ipv6 >> transition.) >> On May 3, 2016 8:35 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: >> >>> Having NAT problems? Having problems tracking down DMCA or subpoena >>> targets? It's impacting your functionality. >>> >>> Moving to IPv6 will also increase performance due to the removal of NAT. >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> ----- >>> Mike Hammett >>> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >>> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >>> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >>> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >>> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >>> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >>> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >>> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >>> >>> >>> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >>> ------------------------------ >>> *From: *"Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> >>> *To: *af@afmug.com >>> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 8:18:33 AM >>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations >>> >>> Seth, >>> >>> I think it is pick your battles when you can. Some of use run at 100% >>> capacity in execution, and we have to carve out additional time to do >>> whatever the "other" things are. And there are a LOT of those "other" >>> things for growing companies. >>> >>> We all know it's important. But, if it is so easy, then when it's time >>> to hit it head on as it will being impacting our functionality, we can >>> "easily" take that time, at that time :) >>> >>> >>> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen >>> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:55 AM >>> To: af@afmug.com >>> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations >>> >>> On 5/2/16 11:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >>> > Everyone *SHOULD* be caring about IPv6. >>> > >>> >>> Why people running ISPs refuse to or are resistant to learn about things >>> directly related to the business they claim to be in baffles me. >>> >>> ~Seth >>> >>> > -- Zach Underwood (RHCE,RHCSA,RHCT,UACA) My website <http://zachunderwood.me> advance-networking.com
