I'm curious why my traffic isn't' reflecting this. I'll look into routes and make sure it all looks right. On another note; has anyone been following this whole Google - Comcast IPv6 kerfluffle?
-Ty -Ty On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 9:20 AM, Mike Hammett <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > Yeah, I think AWS is the last thing that people really care about *not* on > IPv6. > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 9:11:38 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations > > OH REALLY?!? > > WOW! *whistles" > > SO NOW I KNOW!!! :O > > .... *grin* > > I think one of the last remaining large holdouts is AWS as a whole. (There > are parts ipv6 enabled, but it's still a mess.) > > Other than that, as Service Providers we're probably going to end up > having at least a rudimentary CGNAT deployment for a decade if not more, > especially for those of us with large/old industrial/banking/healthcare > customers... > > ... For stuff that should have been retired 20 years ago but is CRITICAL > to their business, and won't run ipv6. > > (For a perfect example of old tech still in use, Google "Compaq laptop > McLaren" :P ) > On May 3, 2016 8:45 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > > Traffic going IPv6 will bypass NAT end-to-end. > > > > > > ----- > Mike Hammett > Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> > <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> > <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> > Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> > <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> > <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> > The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> > <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> > > > <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> > ------------------------------ > *From: *"Josh Reynolds" <j...@kyneticwifi.com> > *To: *af@afmug.com > *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 8:41:28 AM > > *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations > > To be technical, it's not going to remove NAT on your network for the > foreseeable future unless when you add IPV6 that you also give everybody a > public IPV4 as well :P > > Maybe a decade from now we'll be able to ditch NAT :( > > Yes, there are several v6/v4 and v4/v6 translation mechanisms, but those > are really just different types of Network Address Translation, regardless > of if they are officially called that or not. > > (Not that you don't know this Mike, I just don't want the nice people > following along with the list to get the wrong information about the ipv6 > transition.) > On May 3, 2016 8:35 AM, "Mike Hammett" <af...@ics-il.net> wrote: > >> Having NAT problems? Having problems tracking down DMCA or subpoena >> targets? It's impacting your functionality. >> >> Moving to IPv6 will also increase performance due to the removal of NAT. >> >> >> >> >> ----- >> Mike Hammett >> Intelligent Computing Solutions <http://www.ics-il.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/ICSIL> >> <https://plus.google.com/+IntelligentComputingSolutionsDeKalb> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/intelligent-computing-solutions> >> <https://twitter.com/ICSIL> >> Midwest Internet Exchange <http://www.midwest-ix.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/mdwestix> >> <https://www.linkedin.com/company/midwest-internet-exchange> >> <https://twitter.com/mdwestix> >> The Brothers WISP <http://www.thebrotherswisp.com/> >> <https://www.facebook.com/thebrotherswisp> >> >> >> <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCXSdfxQv7SpoRQYNyLwntZg> >> ------------------------------ >> *From: *"Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> >> *To: *af@afmug.com >> *Sent: *Tuesday, May 3, 2016 8:18:33 AM >> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations >> >> Seth, >> >> I think it is pick your battles when you can. Some of use run at 100% >> capacity in execution, and we have to carve out additional time to do >> whatever the "other" things are. And there are a LOT of those "other" >> things for growing companies. >> >> We all know it's important. But, if it is so easy, then when it's time >> to hit it head on as it will being impacting our functionality, we can >> "easily" take that time, at that time :) >> >> >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Seth Mattinen >> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2016 12:55 AM >> To: af@afmug.com >> Subject: Re: [AFMUG] DSL Router Recommendations >> >> On 5/2/16 11:18 PM, Mike Hammett wrote: >> > Everyone *SHOULD* be caring about IPv6. >> > >> >> Why people running ISPs refuse to or are resistant to learn about things >> directly related to the business they claim to be in baffles me. >> >> ~Seth >> >> > >
