No. I have no pmp450 in my network simply due to cost.
Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: > Josh, > > > > Have you tried 450 2.4 in the exact situation where ePMP 2.4 “sucked”? > > > > *From:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *On Behalf Of *Josh Luthman > *Sent:* Thursday, June 2, 2016 5:10 PM > *To:* af@afmug.com > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP > > > > No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done > Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. > > > > > Josh Luthman > Office: 937-552-2340 > Direct: 937-552-2343 > 1100 Wayne St > Suite 1337 > Troy, OH 45373 > > > > On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller < > par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: > > > > hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp > performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Ken Hohhof <af...@kwisp.com> > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP > > > > Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the > antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio > waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the > difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference > environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. > With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off > road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver > sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. > > > > > > *From:* CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net> > > *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Subject:* Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP > > > > > > Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any > (in 2.4) > > we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - - > and from the performance of > > the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > *From:* Matt <matt.mailingli...@gmail.com> > > *To:* af@afmug.com > > *Sent:* Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM > > *Subject:* [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP > > > > We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and > some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far > have not deployed more then couple test links. > > For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences > you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? > > For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning? > > >
