I think if I was cambium, I would have a couple of guys on a plane or in a car with a suitcase of equipment to visit you in the field. This was not the intended or expected outcome for that product.
From: Josh Luthman Sent: Sunday, June 05, 2016 8:17 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Never really left. I would have to lose customers with epmp 2.4 wifi due to lack of signal. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Jun 5, 2016 10:12 PM, "Paul McCall" <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: So you went back to UBNT in 2.4? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Sunday, June 5, 2016 9:57 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP No. I have no pmp450 in my network simply due to cost. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 9:48 PM, Paul McCall <pa...@pdmnet.net> wrote: Josh, Have you tried 450 2.4 in the exact situation where ePMP 2.4 “sucked”? From: Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] On Behalf Of Josh Luthman Sent: Thursday, June 2, 2016 5:10 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP No...it's not. The EPMP 2.4 radios just suck at penetration. I've done Ubnt KPP and IT Elite - they all performed terribly. Josh Luthman Office: 937-552-2340 Direct: 937-552-2343 1100 Wayne St Suite 1337 Troy, OH 45373 On Thu, Jun 2, 2016 at 4:59 PM, CBB - Jay Fuller <par...@cyberbroadband.net> wrote: hmm, i will check into that. Pretty sure with ubnt we're using kp performance. With epmp, i think it is bundled antennas... ----- Original Message ----- From: Ken Hohhof To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:50 PM Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Jay, I suspect the difference you are seeing may be mainly in the antennas. 2.4 GHz from any vendor should penetrate the same, the radio waves don’t care what brand radio launched them. And I think the difference between the platforms will be most evident in low interference environment where they can achieve their full modulation and throughput. With low SNR, I think it’s kind of like arguing Ferrari vs Porsche for off road racing, neither will be able to show off its capabilities. Receiver sensitivity and bits/sec/Hz won’t matter. From: CBB - Jay Fuller Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 3:28 PM To: af@afmug.com Subject: Re: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP Also interested in interference rejection of the pmp450 - is there any (in 2.4) we are getting better foliage penetration with ubnt 2.4 than epmp 2.4 - - and from the performance of the epmp 2.4 i wish wish wish it penetrated better! ----- Original Message ----- From: Matt To: af@afmug.com Sent: Thursday, June 02, 2016 2:25 PM Subject: [AFMUG] PMP450 vs. ePMP We have mostly PMP100 and PMP450 deployed. Some Ubiquiti we tried and some we inherited as well. Have some ePMP we have tested but so far have not deployed more then couple test links. For those who have tried both ePMP and PMP450 what are the differences you have seen in performance? Interference tolerance among others? For those that have gone with PMP450 over ePMP what was the reasoning?
