4.9 is not a good option due to existing public safety links on both sides of border. The new PLCs from Allen Bradley are IP based as well other gear they are now using. Also heard they are considering cameras at Wells not just boosters and wastewater. On Jun 9, 2016 7:43 AM, "Cameron Crum" <cc...@wispmon.com> wrote:
> If they have to have the data throughput then I'd tell them to go with 4.9 > and leave the unlicensed guys alone. But, do they really need it? Is this > like using a backhoe to dig a fence post hole? > > On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> > wrote: > >> Make sure the big ‘ol wall people want ends up blocking the RF? lol >> >> >> On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> While working at Storm Water site today, one of the water Co. SCADA guys >> came by... he discussed that they are looking at WiMax and also 4.9GHz to >> replace existing licensed 900mhz network for our 600 locations. They are >> using MDS SD9 radios for MAS and LEDR for ptp.... they want to move up to >> faster Ethernet based radios.... I listened and offered no comments....I >> was not about to tell them about WiMAX or that our sister city has over 200 >> 4.9GHz links in operation since 2010...I have ideas of what I would >> do...Some background.... .many remote links are NLOS...easy to do with >> their existing 5 Watt licensed radios and APs on 150 Ft elevated tanks or >> mountain. ptp links are easy for most of east and lower valley because of >> tanks available and mountain locations....let's see what you gurus >> suggest....we are on border and it is very noisy in all bands. I mean all >> bands >> >> >> >
