Maybe 4.9 GHz LOS links between towers, and Cambium PMP450i and PTP450i in 900
MHz for the NLOS links?
As long as they stick with cameras that have reasonable BW requirements.
From: Jaime Solorza
Sent: Thursday, June 09, 2016 8:52 AM
To: Animal Farm
Subject: Re: [AFMUG] If it was you...
4.9 is not a good option due to existing public safety links on both sides of
border. The new PLCs from Allen Bradley are IP based as well other gear they
are now using. Also heard they are considering cameras at Wells not just
boosters and wastewater.
On Jun 9, 2016 7:43 AM, "Cameron Crum" <cc...@wispmon.com> wrote:
If they have to have the data throughput then I'd tell them to go with 4.9
and leave the unlicensed guys alone. But, do they really need it? Is this like
using a backhoe to dig a fence post hole?
On Wed, Jun 8, 2016 at 10:54 PM, Cassidy B. Larson <c...@infowest.com> wrote:
Make sure the big ‘ol wall people want ends up blocking the RF? lol
On Jun 8, 2016, at 9:49 PM, Jaime Solorza <losguyswirel...@gmail.com>
wrote:
While working at Storm Water site today, one of the water Co. SCADA guys
came by... he discussed that they are looking at WiMax and also 4.9GHz to
replace existing licensed 900mhz network for our 600 locations. They are using
MDS SD9 radios for MAS and LEDR for ptp.... they want to move up to faster
Ethernet based radios.... I listened and offered no comments....I was not about
to tell them about WiMAX or that our sister city has over 200 4.9GHz links in
operation since 2010...I have ideas of what I would do...Some background....
.many remote links are NLOS...easy to do with their existing 5 Watt licensed
radios and APs on 150 Ft elevated tanks or mountain. ptp links are easy for
most of east and lower valley because of tanks available and mountain
locations....let's see what you gurus suggest....we are on border and it is
very noisy in all bands. I mean all bands
