Their spec sheets are always a serious joke...wait until it actually comes
out.
Josh Luthman
Office: 937-552-2340
Direct: 937-552-2343
1100 Wayne St
Suite 1337
Troy, OH 45373
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 9:20 PM, Bill Prince <part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
> The picture on their web site shows 2 N connectors on the top. They also
> claim in their forum that it will be in the 15 watt range. That sounds
> implausible.
>
>
> bp
> <part15sbs{at}gmail{dot}com>
>
>
> On 6/29/2016 4:49 PM, Eric Kuhnke wrote:
>
> So... It will have four N connectors and four short jumper cables to a
> rear feed on a dish? That will be quite a bit more complicated than a rear
> wavguide/feed adapter which just has two polarity offset H and V pol N
> connectors.
>
> I still don't understand what makes ubnt think they're special and can't
> put a radio with a cylindrical waveguide directly on the rear of a dish,
> such as with a four-bolt REMEC mount.
>
> Good to hear they are planning on direct DC wiring terminals. Who wants to
> bet they successfully put direct -48VDC power capability on the radio (42
> to 56VDC) but don't include an SFP cage?
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 4:31 PM, Rob Genovesi <r...@corp.coastside.net>
> wrote:
>
>> From Gary-UBNT:
>>
>> "We are working on data sheets right now so hopefully you will get more
>> questions answered shortly. The reason for N connectors relates to demand
>> for higher mechanical robustness and the ability for the connectors to be
>> weather-proof as a stand alone connector (fully weatherproof gaskets and
>> the ability to accept larger diameter jumpers readily). The N connectors
>> we use are rated to 18+ GHz."
>>
>> An active thread on the UBNT forums right now, more available here:
>> http://community.ubnt.com/t5/airFiber/Some-AF11X-details/td-p/1512145
>>
>> -Rob
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 12:05 PM, Bill Prince < <part15...@gmail.com>
>> part15...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I'm looking at all the other AF-nnX radios from UBNT, and they all use
>>> SMA connectors. What reason would they have to use N instead of SMA? Seems
>>> the SMA connector would have fewer issues at 11 GHz.
>>>
>>>
>
>
