Isolationist!!!  Engineering is done with metric system... Just because
your in Ohio area doesn't mean you can't use meters.... Lol

On Jul 22, 2016 10:20 AM, "Josh Luthman" <j...@imaginenetworksllc.com>
wrote:

> 45 and 125 mph.  No one knows what you're talking about with the meaters.
>
>
> Josh Luthman
> Office: 937-552-2340
> Direct: 937-552-2343
> 1100 Wayne St
> Suite 1337
> Troy, OH 45373
>
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 12:12 PM, Harold Bledsoe <hbledso...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> It's actually fairly forgiving.  Our 1.1km link has not lost connection
>> from wind at all and it has been up above 70kph.  The standard and LR
>> brackets are both tested to 200kph for your reference.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Hal
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 22, 2016 at 7:53 AM Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net> wrote:
>>
>>> We are planning to use them on 10-12m steel poles. The poles are very
>>> solid built and with a concrete
>>> <http://www.dict.cc/englisch-deutsch/concrete.html> foundation
>>> <http://www.dict.cc/englisch-deutsch/foundation.html>
>>>
>>> but they might sway a bit due to the length with heavy wind. Is this
>>> critical? Is failover with 5Ghz fast enough to
>>>
>>> overcome short moves?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Faisal Imtiaz
>>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 21:34
>>>
>>>
>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So having dealt with multiple links, I can tell you that if you are
>>> missing some db's it has to do with alignment.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We are seeing -55/-59 on our 450m link
>>>
>>>  and on our 250m link we are seeing -43/-47 signal (and had to reduce
>>> power on 60ghz on one side.. .i.e. we are not aligned perfectly )
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So I can say affirmatively there is no 'missing power' it has to do with
>>> alignment...
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> :)
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>
>>>
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, July 21, 2016 3:14:16 PM
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>> Do you get the calculated rx-power?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com <af-boun...@afmug.com>] *Im
>>> Auftrag von *Faisal Imtiaz
>>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 20:33
>>>
>>>
>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> It would be appropriate to point out that there are two versions or
>>> Metrolinq 60ghz Radios one smaller lower power and other larger higher
>>> power.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> We have been using the larger units (Circular cones) for links 250m to
>>> 450m successfully.. aiming them with the shipping brackets is a whole
>>> another challenge.. I am very happy to the the LR brackets available and
>>> those should go long ways is aligning longer links. .
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>>
>>>
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Carl Peterson" <cpeter...@portnetworks.com>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>>
>>>
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, July 21, 2016 11:57:41 AM
>>>
>>> *Subject: *Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>> We haven't had any issues with 5GHz but the 60GHz side underwhelms.  We
>>> tried a 900' link and couldn't get the 60Ghz side to work.  We were able to
>>> move one end and get it down to 600' and have a 60GHz link at -55 but that
>>> is 10-15db below where it should be.  It's working, but at this point I
>>> wouldn't use it for anything over 500' or so.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jul 21, 2016 at 10:40 AM, Stefan Englhardt <s...@genias.net>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> We’ve only dfs bands in 5 GHz. Metrolinq supports only the lower band
>>> with lower allowed power (1W EiRP).
>>>
>>> I’ve installed the newest FW before doing anything so I might be lucky
>>> to avoid the biggest problems (hopefully).
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> *Von:* Af [mailto:af-boun...@afmug.com] *Im Auftrag von *Faisal Imtiaz
>>> *Gesendet:* Donnerstag, 21. Juli 2016 16:30
>>> *An:* af@afmug.com
>>> *Betreff:* Re: [AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Interesting.. most folks have the opposite issue.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> FWIW, there is no dfs support on 5ghz (not sure about non-american
>>> rules).
>>>
>>> If you are bench testing... you need to turn down the power on 5ghz ..
>>> way down....
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Faisal Imtiaz
>>> Snappy Internet & Telecom
>>> 7266 SW 48 Street
>>> Miami, FL 33155
>>> Tel: 305 663 5518 x 232
>>>
>>> Help-desk: (305)663-5518 Option 2 or Email: supp...@snappytelecom.net
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------
>>>
>>> *From: *"Stefan Englhardt" <s...@genias.net>
>>> *To: *af@afmug.com
>>> *Sent: *Thursday, July 21, 2016 8:13:34 AM
>>> *Subject: *[AFMUG] Metrolinq
>>>
>>> Got my first links. 60GHz work fine in lab. The 5GHz Part does strange
>>> things. Does not initialze or does not connect.
>>>
>>> Syslog gives dfs or cant initialize messages.
>>>
>>> 60GHz is up immediately und runs stable in lab. Latency is low. Feels
>>> like a 1G cable connection. Powered by Netonix 24V.
>>>
>>> Takes only 6 Watts. Good build quality. Webinterface is easy and fast.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> So a cheap option for fast short hops where you dont want to dig.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>> Carl Peterson
>>>
>>> *PORT NETWORKS*
>>>
>>> 401 E Pratt St, Ste 2553
>>>
>>> Baltimore, MD 21202
>>>
>>> (410) 637-3707
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to