IMNSHO, more money has not typically translated to better networks in
this biz...
On 09/30/2016 09:31 AM, Josh Reynolds wrote:
To add to this, there's a lot of poorly run UBNT networks out there
simply because the price made the equipment more accessable.
I'm sure there's a fair share of poorly designed cambium networks as
well, but likely not as many (more money in the company, higher % of
experienced professionals, etc).
I'm sure there will be just as many poorly designed and ran ePMP and
Mimosa networks given time :)
On Sep 30, 2016 11:08 AM, "Paul Stewart" <p...@paulstewart.org
<mailto:p...@paulstewart.org>> wrote:
ohhh… good conversation in my opinion.
I came from a pure Cambium/Moto shop and now work with a company
that is pure ubiquiti … but i’m not hands on with that side of the
shop …. would say with everything I’ve seen from a distance that I
really miss Cambium gear ;)
> On Sep 30, 2016, at 9:47 AM, Sam Morris <w...@csilogan.com
<mailto:w...@csilogan.com>> wrote:
>
> Knowing what you know, if you were starting a WISP, based solely
on performance and manageability, if you had to be 100% one or the
other would you select Ubiquiti or Cambium 450x for your APs and
CPE/SM hardware (leaving the backhaul out of the discussion)?
>
> Thanks,
> Sam
